Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Energy Sustain Dev. 2018 Oct;46:82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.001

Table 2.

LPG stove adoption and fuel use patterns among 375 representative households in Puno, Peru.

Any stove use Total FISE Beneficiaries Non-FISE Beneficiaries p-value
Currently uses LPG stove, n(%) 255/375 (68.0) 218/226 (96.5) 37/149 (24.8) <0.001
Currently uses traditional open fire stove 361/375 (96.3) 215/226 (95.1) 146/149 (98.0) 0.15
Currently uses improved biomass cookstove* 3/375 (0.8) 2/226 (0.9) 1/149 (0.7) 0.82
Uses LPG stove exclusively, n(%) 13/375 (3.5) 10/226 (4.4) 3/149 (2.0) 0.21
Adopted LPG after FISE 210/226 (92.9)
Additional fuel use
Wood 201/375 (53.6) 132/226 (58.4) 69/149 (46.3) 0.02
Dung 344/375 (91.7) 204/226 (90.3) 140/149 (94.0) 0.20
Crop waste 142/375 (37.9) 65/226 (28.8) 77/149 (51.7) <0.001
Kerosene 6/375 (1.6) 1/226 (0.4) 5/149 (3.4) 0.03
Alcohol 21/375 (5.6) 11/226 (4.9) 10/149 (6.7) 0.45
Charcoal 1/375 (0.3) 0/226 (0.0) 1/149 (0.7) 0.40
Fuel Use Patterns
No. of LPG cylinders used per month among LPG users, mean(SD) 1.1 (0.4) n=256 1.1 (0.4) n=219 1.1 (0.4) n=37 0.91
% of weekly meals cooked on LPG stove on average among LPG users 60.6 (25.9) n=256 61.2 (25.5) n=219 57.6 (28.5) n=37 0.43
Cooks for animals 277/373 (74.3) 171/225 (76.0) 106/148 (71.6) 0.91
*

Biomass-burning cookstove manufactured for improved combustion efficiency.