Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 22;9:4388. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06783-0

Table 2.

Associations of APOE genotype with risk of PSP and CBD

Association (vs. ε3/ε3 unless otherwise noted) No. (%) in controls No. (%) in PSP No. (%) in CBD Association with PSP (vs. controls) Association with CBD (vs. controls)
OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
All subjects N = 1406 N = 994 N = 134
Presence of ε2 261 (18.6) 151 (15.2) 20 (14.9) 0.75 (0.59, 0.95) 0.019 0.90 (0.53, 1.55) 0.71
Presence of ε4 376 (26.7) 241 (24.2) 49 (36.6) 0.82 (0.67, 1.01) 0.058 1.44 (0.97, 2.16) 0.071
APOE genotype
  ε2/ε2 5 (0.4) 13 (1.3) 2 (1.5) 4.38 (1.44, 13.33) 0.009 5.24 (0.89, 31.04) 0.068
  ε2/ε3 210 (14.9) 116 (11.7) 14 (10.5) 0.69 (0.53, 0.90) 0.0063 0.80 (0.44, 1.47) 0.47
  ε2/ε4 46 (3.3) 22 (2.2) 4 (3.0) 0.67 (0.39, 1.18) 0.17 0.94 (0.27, 3.19) 0.91
  ε3/ε3 815 (58.0) 624 (62.8) 69 (51.5) 1.00 (reference) N/A 1.00 (reference) N/A
  ε3/ε4 313 (22.3) 201 (20.2) 42 (31.3) 0.81 (0.65, 1.01) 0.064 1.49 (0.98, 2.27) 0.060
  ε4/ε4 17 (1.2) 18 (1.8) 3 (2.2) 1.32 (0.65, 2.71) 0.44 1.69 (0.46, 6.24) 0.43
Presence of ε2/ε2 vs. all other genotypes 5 (0.4) 13 (1.3) 2 (1.5) 4.41 (1.54, 12.61) 0.0057 4.86 (0.81, 29.01) 0.083
Excluding MAPT H1/H1 subjects N = 599 N = 109 N = 17
Presence of ε2 114 (19.0) 15 (13.8) 3 (17.7) 0.63 (0.34, 1.15) 0.13 1.11 (0.29, 4.22) 0.88
Presence of ε4 157 (26.2) 26 (23.9) 5 (29.4) 0.82 (0.50, 1.35) 0.44 1.32 (0.43, 4.04) 0.63
APOE genotype
  ε2/ε2 2 (0.3) 4 (3.7) 1 (5.9) 8.09 (1.43, 45.81) 0.018 20.79 (1.56, 277.20) 0.022
  ε2/ε3 87 (14.5) 10 (9.2) 2 (11.8) 0.55 (0.27, 1.12) 0.099 0.91 (0.19, 4.31) 0.90
  ε2/ε4 25 (4.2) 1 (0.9) 0 (0.0) 0.18 (0.023, 1.37) 0.098 N/A 1.00a
  ε3/ε3 353 (58.9) 69 (63.3) 9 (52.9) 1.00 (reference) N/A 1.00 (reference) N/A
  ε3/ε4 125 (20.9) 24 (22.0) 5 (29.4) 0.96 (0.57, 1.60) 0.87 1.62 (0.53, 4.97) 0.40
  ε4/ε4 7 (1.2) 1 (0.9) 0 (0.0) 0.67 (0.08, 5.60) 0.71 N/A 1.00a
Presence of ε2/ε2 vs. all other genotypes 2 (0.3) 4 (3.7) 1 (5.9) 9.56 (1.71, 53.38) 0.010 21.40 (1.70, 270.53) 0.018

ORs, 95% CIs, and P-values result from logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, and number of MAPT H1 alleles (number of MAPT H1 alleles was not adjusted for in analysis excluding MAPT H1/H1 subjects). The ε3/ε3 genotype was the reference category for all comparisons unless otherwise noted

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

aP-value results from Fisher’s exact test due to the absence of CBD patients with an ε2/ε4 or ε4/ε4 genotype. P-values ≤ 0.00625 were considered as statistically significant after applying a Bonferroni correction for the eight statistical tests that were performed in the separate PSP vs. controls and CBD vs. controls analyses