Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 23;183:522–531. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.035

Table 1.

Main effects for contrasts from the food image paradigm

Contrasts k Z value MNI Effect size r
      coordinates (Z/√N)
Appetizing food > unappetizing
food
 Superior parietal lobe 1077 5.90 −9, −66, 57 0.51
 Cuneus   5.71 −27, −81, 30 0.50
 Precuneus   5.66 −12, −81, 45 0.49
 Posterior cerebellar lobe 355 5.82 24, −66, −27 0.51
 Posterior cerebellar lobe   4.35 −15, −69, −24 0.38
 Posterior cerebellar lobe   4.30 3, −69, −24 0.37
 Anterior cingulate cortex 146 5.42 −3, 9, 30 0.47
 Supplemental motor area   4.90 0, 3, 48 0.43
 Supplemental motor area   4.29 −3, −3, 57 0.37
 Middle frontal gyrus 87 5.02 −27, −9, 57 0.44
 Middle frontal gyrus   3.54 −24, 6, 60 0.31
 Posterior cingulate cortex 187 4.95 −15, −57, 12 0.43
 Anterior cerebellar lobe   4.65 6, −48, −6 0.40
 Anterior cerebellar lobe   4.31 −3, −48, −3 0.37
 Striatum 38 4.79 6, 21, 0 0.42
 Cuneus 113 4.56 9, −93, 15 0.40
 Cuneus   4.13 9, −90, 24 0.36
 Cuneus   3.98 −6, −99, 6 0.35
 Rolandic operculum 63 3.91 57, −12, 27 0.34
 Rolandic operculum   3.69 54, −6, 18 0.32
Appetizing food > glasses of water
 Lingual gyrus 6993 Inf* −3, −87, −12 >0.9
 Lingual gyrus   Inf* 15, −90, −12 >0.9
 Lingual gyrus   Inf* 9, −84, −12 >0.0
 Mid insula 37 Inf* −36, −6, 9 >0.9
 Inferior frontal gyrus 165 Inf* −51, 9, 27 >0.9
 Inferior frontal gyrus   6.01 −51, 6, 39 0.52
 Medial orbitofrontal cortex 35 7.52 −30, 36, −18 0.65
 Inferior frontal gyrus 62 6.30 57, 9, 30 0.55
 Inferior frontal gyrus   4.52 51, 6, 42 0.39
 Supplemental motor area 144 5.40 0, 6, 57 0.47
 Mid cingulate cortex   4.60 0, 15, 39 0.4-
 Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex 50 4.80 −45, 39, 9 0.42
 Inferior frontal gyrus   4.11 −51, 33, 15 0.36
 Middle frontal gyrus   3.70 −51, 27, 24 0.32
*

Z-value > 12.00. For all contrasts, activated regions, z-values and coordinates within the MNI coordinate system are displayed. Number of continuous voxels (k) are shown for peak coordinates. Peaks within the regions were considered significant at k > 34, P<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons across the entire brain.