Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 16;9:1448. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01448

Table 5.

Estimation of allelic effects (in percent) of nine Oil C-QTL involving five SE mapping populations and comparative allelic status of the seven parental lines.

Consensus QTL Allelic effect of Oil C-QTLa Comparative allelic status of parentsb
EJ8A8B7 EPJA8B7 VH A8B7 DEB7 TDA8
Oil-C-A7-1 1.1 (J) 1.2 (H) J > E = H = D = T = P > V
Oil-C-A8-1 3.0 (J) 3.0 (P) 2.0 (V) 1.5 (T) J = P > V > T > D = E = H
Oil-C-A10-1 1.1 (V) 2.4 (T) T > V > D = E = H = J = P
Oil-C-B1-1 1.0 (J) 0.9 (P) J > P > E = H = D = T = V
Oil-C-B2-1 1.2 (E) 0.8 (E) T = D = V = E = H > P > J
Oil-C-B3-1 0.7 (J) 1.8 (E) J > E = H = D = T = V > P
Oil-C-B4-1 0.3 (J) 1.1 (D) T = D > J > E = H = V = P
Oil-C-B6-1 1.3 (J) 1.0 (D) J > D = T > E = H = V = P
Oil-C-B7-1 1.7 (J) 1.2 (P) 2.7 (V) 2.6 (D) V > T = D > J > P > E = H
a

The parental lines contributing the trait enhancing allele are shown in parentheses.

b

J, J8; E, EH-2; H, Heera; D, Donskaja-IV; T, TM-4; P, Pusa Jaikisan; V, Varuna.