Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 2;7(10):4964–4979. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1756

Table 5.

Comparison of treatment characteristics of definitive RT cohort

Treatment characteristics HVC LVC MVA
n (%) n (%) P value OR (95% CI)
RT duration (wk)
≤7 466 (46) 62 (30) <0.001 REF
>7 546 (54) 136 (65) <0.001 0.49 (0.31‐0.77)
Unknown duration 6 (1) 12 (6) 0.036 0.19 (0.04‐0.9)
Total RT dose
<66/60 Gy 59 (6) 22 (11) <0.001 REF
≥66/60 Gy 955 (94) 145 (69) 0.031 2.36 (1.08‐5.12)
Unknown dose 4 (0) 43 (21) <0.001 0.11 (0.03‐0.47)
IMRT
IMRT (−) 272 (27) 29 (14) <0.001 REF
IMRT (+) 690 (68) 60 (29) 0.694 0.9 (0.53‐1.52)
Unknown IMRT status 56 (6) 121 (58) <0.001 0.07 (0.04‐0.12)
Chemotherapya
Chemo (−) 232 (23) 57 (27)
Chemo (+) 786 (77) 153 (73)    
DTI (d)a
≤45 497 (49) 92 (44)
46+ 521 (51) 118 (56)    

95%CI, 95% confidence interval; DTI, diagnosis to treatment initiation; HVC, high‐volume center; HPV, human papillomavirus; IMRT, intensity‐modulated radiotherapy; LVC, low‐volume center; MVA, multivariate analysis; n, number of patients; OR, odds ratio; REF, reference variable; RT, radiation.

a

Not included on MVA.