Table 4.

Actor‐partner interdependence models^{^}

Actor effects	Dyads		Triads
	Estimate	P value	Estimate	P value
YBCS
First‐degree relationship*	−0.166	0.364	0.191	0.226
Age	0.001	0.788	0.011	0.502
Black race*	0.285	0.068	0.014	0.949
Education	0.082	0.053	−0.073	0.329
Income	−0.010	0.308	0.008	0.573
Single relationship status	−0.159	0.175	−0.082	0.724
Lives alone	−0.103	0.491	0.101	0.714
Years since diagnosis*	0.040	0.015	−0.050	0.031
Anxiety	−0.198	0.075	−0.212	0.250
Depression	−0.282	0.014	−0.308	0.098
Cost‐related lack of access to care	−0.302	0.007	−0.395	0.046
Fear of recurrence*	0.048	0.286	0.025	0.649
Self‐efficacy*	0.288	<0.001	0.303	<0.001
Perceived risk	−0.004	0.857	−0.004	0.911
Relatives
First‐degree relationship*	0.098	0.572	0.219	0.092
Age	0.001	0.788	0.001	0.697
Black race*	0.419	0.005	0.424	0.022
Education	0.082	0.053	0.057	0.171
Income	−0.010	0.308	0.002	0.807
Single relationship status	−0.159	0.175	−0.087	0.340
Lives alone	−0.103	0.491	0.113	0.408
Years since diagnosis*	−0.002	0.883	−0.023	0.224
Anxiety	−0.198	0.075	0.119	0.265
Depression	−0.282	0.014	−0.025	0.819
Cost‐related lack of access to care	−0.302	0.007	−0.225	0.016
Perceived risk	0.004	0.857	−0.026	0.198
Partner effects†
YBCS → relative
Age	0.007	0.202	0.032	0.017
Depression	−0.168	0.148	−0.369	0.017
Self‐efficacy*	0.067	0.309	0.116	0.047
Relative → YBCS
Income	0.010	0.298	0.019	0.034

Unstandardized estimates (B) and standard errors (SE) reported.

^The dependent variable of the APIM analyses is the Family Support Index (PCA of the three scales); boldface indicates P < 0.05.

†Only significant (P < 0.05) partner effects in the triad data are reported along with the complementary nonsignificant results in the dyadic analysis; no significant (P < 0.05) partner effects were observed in dyadic data.

*Dyad‐level predictors were degree type, race, and years since diagnosis; fear of recurrence and self‐efficacy were reported only by YBCS.