Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;7(10):5107–5117. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1753

Table 3.

Distribution of patients and outcomes combining BCR‐ABL1 transcript levels at 4‐wk and 3‐mo

Group VEMR 3 mos EMR Number of patients CCyR by 1 y MMR by 1 y CI of MMR by 5 y CI of DMR by 5 y OS by 5 y PFS by 5 y EFS‐aa by 5 y EFS‐bb by 5 y
Group 1 Yes Yes 89 83/89 (93.3%) 56/89 (62.9%) 91.7% ± 4.1 62.1% ± 10.1 98.8% ± 1.2 98.8% ± 1.2 92.3% ± 4.5 73.6% ± 7.1
Group 2 No 8 74/95 (77.9%) 22/95 (23.2%) 64.8% ± 9.7 33.8% ± 10.0 97.5% ± 1.7 96.9% ± 1.8 84.0% ± 4.1 56.7% ± 7.3
Group 3 No Yes 87
Group 4 No 29 14/29 (48.3%) 2/29 (6.9%) 74.1% ± 21.5 20.0% ± 17.9 100% 100% 70.0% ± 11.8 48.2% ± 12.8
Log‐rank P <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.006 0.723 0.512 0.005 0.007
Log‐rank P between subgroups Group 1 vs 2 and 3 0.006 0.001 <0.0001 0.063 0.603 0.389 0.013 0.016
Group 1 vs 4 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.015 0.992 0.991 0.005 0.005
Group 2 and 3 vs 4 0.002 0.121 0.169 0.342 0.971 0.967 0.385 0.285

2G TKI, second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibition; CI, confidence interval; DMR, deep molecular response; EFS, event‐free survival; MMR, molecular response; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival.

a

EFS‐a: PFS + ELN treatment failure + ELN warning.

b

EFS‐b: PFS + ELN treatment failure + ELN warning + frontline TKI discontinuation (except treatment free remission).