Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 9;25(2):296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.037

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Word-Specific Phase Similarity between recall2 and TMR

(A) Recurrent reactivation of recall-related phase patterns at 5 Hz during TMR emerged over right temporal electrodes. The topography displays the test statistics of the averaged difference in phase similarity between remembered and not-remembered words (0–2.5 s). The time course depicts t-values averaged across highlighted electrodes (n = 6). The phase similarity at a given time point reflects the similarity computed in a window of ±500 ms around this time point.

(B) Assessing phase similarity at 5 Hz between every time point of retrieval and TMR confirmed the re-occurring pattern of similarity.

(C) Source reconstruction. The difference in phase similarity for remembered and not-remembered items indicates effects in right (para)hippocampal regions and left frontal areas.

(D) Frequency spectrum of the TMR similarity measures showed a ∼1 Hz periodicity of reactivation processes. Shading denotes SEM.

(E) In line with behavioral predictions, providing a target stimulus after the TMR cue blocked associated reactivation processes. The time course depicts t-values averaged across highlighted electrodes in (A). Presentation of the target word is highlighted in petrol blue. Only a brief reactivation effect at 270 ms (before target word onset) emerged. The topography displays the test statistics of the averaged difference in phase similarity between remembered and not-remembered words (0–2.5 s). No significant cluster was found.

See also Figures S1, S2, and S3.