Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol. 2018 Mar 26;74(3):261–280. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.026

Table 3.

Overview of the studies included in the systematic review on factors affecting choice and adherence to active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer.

# Author Year Reference Design N or
Response
rate (%)
Country Study
population/
setting
Data
collection
method
(instrument)
Study
period
Age
(mean)
1 Davison, et al 2012 [32] Cross-sectional survey to AS patients 180/258 (70%) Canada Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(Likert scale)
2009–2011 67
2 Goh, et al 2012 [50] Cross-sectional survey to AS patients 34/34 (100%) USA Research/Support Group Survey/Interviews May-August 2011 63
3 Orom, et al 2014 [51] Cross-sectional survey to AS patients 120/126 (79%) USA Clinical/Hospital Survey 2010–2012 65
4 Xu, et al 2016 [27] Cross-sectional survey to patients with localized PC 260/559 (68%) USA Population Database Survey 2009–2010 61
5 Orom, et al 2017 [33] Prospective survey of patients undergoing AS/RP/RT 1,531/3,337 (46%) USA Database/
Hospital
Survey
(Distress thermometer - 11 point analogue scale)
2010–2014 Unknown
6 Anandadas, et al 2011 [25] Prospective survey to AS patients 768/768 (100%) UK Clinical/Hospital Survey
(RAND-36 Item – SF-36 v.2, UCLA-PCI, study-specific survey)
2000–2006 65
7 Gorin, et al 2011 [41] Prospective survey to AS patients 105/185 (57%) USA Clinical/
Hospital
Survey Unknown 66
8 Loeb, et al 2016 [52] Qualitative interviews with PC clinicians 24 USA Hospital/
Community
Interviews
(thematically analysed)
July to Dec 2015 N/A
9 Volk, et al 2014 [40] Qualitative interviews with AS patients and RP/RT patients 30/36 (83%) USA Clinical/
Hospital
Interviews
(thematically analysed)
2011 63
10 Xu, et al 2012 [45] Qualitative interviews with patients with LRPC 21 USA Research/
Clinical community
Interviews
(thematically analysed)
Unknown 58
11 O’Callaghan, et al 2014 [46] Qualitative interviews with patients with LRPCand their partners 21 men and 14 partners Australia Clinical/
Hospital and community
Interviews (thematically analysed and inter-rated) 2012–2013 Range 61–70
12 Aizer, et al 2012 [22] Retrospective cohort/registry study 701 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Database Unknown 62
13 Loeb, et al 2013 [24] Retrospective cohort/registry study 57,713 Sweden Population database. Database 1998–2011 65
14 Filson, et al 2014 [37] Retrospective cohort/registry study 7,347 USA Population database Database 2004–2007 66+
15 Hoffman, et al 2014 [34] Retrospective cohort/registry study 12,068 USA Population database. Database 2006–2009 66
16 Liu, et al 2015 [26] Retrospective cohort/registry study 609 USA Population database. Hospital and community Database 2012–2013 65
17 Maurice, et al 2015 [35] Retrospective cohort/registry study 189,768 USA Population database Database 2010–2011 Unknown
18 Womble, et al 2015 [23] Retrospective cohort/registry study 682 USA Population database. Hospital and community Database 2012–2013 63
19 Loeb, et al 2016 [11] Retrospective cohort/registry study 32,518 Sweden Population database. Database 2009–2014 67
20 Mishra, et al 2013 [47] Content analysis of patient’s internet conversations 464 USA Internet conversations Qualitative software – (Sentiment index) 2002–2012 Unknown
21 Ehdaie, et al 2017 [44] Prospective counselling intervention to physicians 5 surgeons; 1,003 patients USA Clinical/
Hospital
Database and Survey 2014–2015 60
22 Venderbos, et al 2015 [82] Retrospective survey comparing anxiety and distress at 0, 9 and 18 months on AS 150 (86%, 90%, 96% at 0, 9 and 18 months) Netherlands Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(CES-D Scale, MAX-PC, STAI-6, DCS)
2007–2008 Unknown
23 Venderbos, et al 2017 [67] Retrospective survey comparing HRQoL in treatment groups: AS, RP, RT to matched patients 879
(65–75%)
Europe Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(EPIC, SF-12, STAI-6,
EQ-VAS)
2015 65 (AS),
66 (RT), 70 (RP)
24 Loeb, et al 2015 [29] Retrospective cohort/registry study 11,726 Sweden Population database Database 2003–2007 64
25 Lang, et al 2017 [31] Prospective survey to AS patients 531 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Survey 2011–2012 Unknown
26 Hamdy, et al 2016 [30] Prospective cohort/registry study 1643 UK Clinical/
Hospital
Survey/Database 1999–2009 61
27 Kendel, et al 2016 [79] Prospective survey study – men on AS and RP 316 Germany Clinical/
Hospital
Survey 2008–2013 67
28 Vasarainen, et 2012 [65] Prospective cohort/registry study.
HRQoL + drop-out
75,124 Helsinki Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(RAND-36, IIEF-5, IPSS)
2006–2010 64
29 Bellardita, et al 2013 [60] Prospective cohort/registry study. HRQoL and database AS adjustment analysis 103 Italy Clinical/
Hospital
Survey/
Database
(Mental health - symptom checklist-90, HRQoL – Prostate version)
2007–2012 67
30 Vanagas, et al 2013 [66] Prospective survey study.
HRQoL, anxiety and depression amongst AS, RP, RT, Chemo and HT
61/650 Lithuania Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(EORTC, QLQ-C30)
2010–2011 >64
31 Hegarty, et al 2008 [61] Retrospective survey of men on AS – to assess differences in HRQoL and anxiety and depression in men in the US and Ireland 29 USA and Ireland Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(MUIS-C, UCLA-PCI, QLI)
Unknown 76
32 Smith, et al 2009 [70] Retrospective cohort registry survey assessing AS HRQoL and cancer related data 3 years into an AS pathway 200/1647 Australia Clinical/
Hospital
Survey/
Database
(SF-12, IPSS)
2000–2002 63
33 Parker, et al 2016 [63] Prospective cohort survey assessing HRQoL and anxiety in AS 180 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(EPIC, SF-12)
2006–2012 67
34 Punnen, et al 2013 [14] Prospective cohort survey, assessing differences between RP and AS (at 1 and 3 years) in respect to HRQol, anxiety and depression. 122/679 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(PHQ-9,
GAD-7)
2007–2010 60
35 Lane, et al 2016 [75] Prospective cohort survey study, assessing HRQoL in AS, RP, RT 1438 UK Clinical/
Hospital
Survey 1999–2009 61
36 van den Bergh, et al 2010 [71] Prospective cohort survey study (PRIAS) assessing progression, HRQol, anxiety and depression and patient factors between men on AS, RP and RT. 129/150 Netherlands Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(CES-D.
STAI, SF-12)
2007–2008 65
37 Xu, et al 2011 [81] Qualitative interviews with patients with LRPC 7 black men, 14 white men USA Clincal/ Hospital Qualitative interview
(thematically analysed)
Unknown Unknown
38 Xu, et al 2016 [78] Retrospective cross-sectional survey 266/391 (68%) USA Clinical/
Hospital
Survey 2009–2010 75
39 Wilcox, et al 2014 [62] Prospective survey of men on AS – assessing HRQoL and anxiety and depression 47/61 Australia Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(IIEF-5, IPSS, MAX-PC, UAS)
2013 62
40 Burnet, et al 2007 [72] Prospective survey study assessing anxiety and depression in men on AS 100/329 UK Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(HADS)
Unknown 67
41 Davison, et al 2011 [73] Retrospective survey study to assess the support and information men require to sustain them while on AS. 25 Canada Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(The control preferences scale)
2009–2010 64
42 Anderson, et al 2014 [74] Prospective cohort survey study to assess anxieties in men AS and determine which of these anxieties predicted health-related quality of life (HRQL) 86 Australia Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(HADS
MAX-PC,
FACT-P, STAI)
Unknown 66
43 Oliffe, et al 2009 [59] A prospective survey study to describe the range of men’s self-management strategies used to overcome AS-related uncertainty 25 Canada Clinical/
Hospital
Survey Unknown Unknown
44 Berger, et al 2014 [85] Retrospective interview study to generate hypotheses about the factors that influence patients’ decisions to leave AS. 14/1159 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Qualitative interviews
(thematically analysed)
2010–2013 Unknown
45 Seiler, et al 2012 [86] Prospective cross-sectional survey study, to assess differences in anxiety and depression amongst couples 133 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Survey Feb 2010 – August 2010 66
46 Kinsella, et al 2015 [88] Prospective education intervention to men on AS 117/244 UK Clinical/
Hospital
Survey/
Database
2011–2012 63
47 Bokhorst, et al 2015 [93] Retrospective registry study to determine the number of non-compliers with the follow-up protocol of the (PRIAS) study 4547 Netherlands Population database Database/
Registry
Unknown 66
48 Wade, et al 2015 [48] A prospective cohort survey study assessing nurse-led AS clinics for accessibility, flexibility and level of support 85 UK Clinical/
Hospital
Survey and interviews
(thematically analysed)
2006–2008 64
49 Weerakoon, et al 2015 [12] Retrospective registry study 1603 Australia Population Registry 2008–2012 66
50 Kazer, et al 2011 [55] Focus group analysis of the needs of men on AS 7 USA Research Focus group 2009–2010 70
51 Wade, et al 2013 [49] Prospective/Retrospective survey study 1144 (88–95%) at 7 and 35 days post biopsy UK Clinical/
Research
Survey
HRQoL, HADS.
2006–2008 62
52 Wade, et al 2015 [89] In-depth semi-structured interviews at 10 and 18 weeks post biopsy 85 UK Clinical/ Research Interviews
(thematically analysed)
2006–2008 64
53 Latini, et al 2007 [80] Retrospective survey study 105 USA Registry/
Database
Survey
5-item fear of cancer re-occurrence questionnaire
1997–2002 75
54 Jeldres, et al 2015 [64] A prospective cohort survey
using validated HRQoL questionnaires
305 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(EPIC,
RAND Medical outcomes short form,
SF-36)
2007 65 (AS), 58 (RP)
55 Donovan, et al 2016 [68] A prospective cohort survey using validated questionnaires to assess PROMs - HRQoL to compare men choosing surgery versus radiotherapy versus active monitoring. 545/1643 UK Clinical/
Hospital
Survey
(EPIC, SF-12, HADS, EORTC QLQ-C3021, ICQ-16, ICSmaleSF)
1999–2009 61
56 Parikh, et al 2017 [36] Retrospective cohort/registry study using the National Cancer Database to determine patterns of AS uptake 40,839 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Registry 2010–2013 61 (CI)
63 (AS)
57 Loeb, et al 2017 [83] A qualitative study with patient focus groups and semi-structured interviews with providers, to understand the informational needs of men on AS and influences on provider decision making. 61 USA Clinical/
Hospital
7 focus groups and 24 semi-structured interviews July 2015-March 2016 Unknown
58 Bokhorst, et al 2016 [92] A retrospective cohort review of hospital charts to assess the impact of biopsy complications on re-biopsy 1164 Worldwide Clinical/
Hospital
Review of hospital charts Unknown Unknown
59 Le, et al 2017 [43] In-depth close-ended questions and semi-structured telephone interviews, to assess decision making processes by men and their partners in respect to AS and CI 30 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Interviews May-August 2011 Range 49–72
60 Scherr, et al 2017 [53] A retrospective review of hospital charts, and structured interview questions and prospective likeart scale survey and HRQOL validated tools. 92/211 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Review of hospital charts, structured interview, Survey
(MAX-PC)
2008–2012 63
61 Taylor, et al 2016 [28] A prospective longitudinal cohort study of telephone interviews pre-treatment to assess influences on treatment decision preferences 1140 USA Clinical/ Hospital Interviews 2012–2014 61.5
62 Mader, et al 2017 [42] Retrospective patient semi-structured interviews assessing choice factors in AS 15 USA Clinical/ Hospital Interviews Unknown 65
63 Lyons, et al 2017 [56] A retrospective interview study on cognitive and affective processing involved in treatment decision making with patients and clinicians 18 (providers) and 19 (patients) USA Clinical/ Hospital Interviews Unknown 65
64 Chen, et al 2017 [69] A prospective cohort survey using a validated questionnaire to assess HRQoL. 314/1141 USA Clinical/
Hospital
Survey -
Prostate cancer symptom indicies
2011–2013 67