Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: Multisens Res. 2016;29(4-5):397–420. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002521

Table 4.

Linear mixed effects model results for: (1) Multisensory RT facilitation; (2) effect of group status; (3) group status by multisensory RT facilitation; and (4) adjustments

Group/Adjustment Condition Estimate 95% confidence interval SE p value
Lower Upper
(1) RT facilitation Multisensory VS vs. S 92.56 77.17 107.96 7.82 < 0.001
Multisensory VS vs. V 31.76 16.37 47.16 7.82 < 0.001
(2) Group status Group 4 vs. Group 1 −20.89 −59.69 17.91 19.66 0.289
Group 4 vs. Group 2 −26.16 −73.81 21.49 24.14 0.280
Group 4 vs. Group 3 −16.05 −55.69 23.59 20.08 0.425
(3) Group status × RT facilitation [Group 4 vs. Group 1] × [Multisensory VS vs. S] −25.89 −43.59 −8.19 9.00 0.004
[Group 4 vs. Group 2] × [Multisensory VS vs. S] −34.77 −56.28 −13.26 10.93 0.002
[Group 4 vs. Group 3] × [Multisensory VS vs. S] −16.75 −34.82 1.32 9.18 0.069
[Group 4 vs. Group 1] × [Multisensory VS vs. V] −5.50 −23.20 12.21 9.00 0.542
[Group 4 vs. Group 2] × [Multisensory VS vs. V] 5.00 −16.51 26.51 10.93 0.648
[Group 4 vs. Group 3] × [Multisensory VS vs. V] 1.62 −16.44 19.69 9.18 0.860
(4) Adjustments Age −0.80 −2.74 1.13 0.98 0.414
Gender −30.12 −54.18 −6.05 12.18 0.015
GHS 0.61 −11.98 13.21 6.37 0.924
Neuropathy −10.15 −67.44 47.13 28.99 0.727