Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 31;10(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s40820-017-0165-1

Table 2.

Comparison of the performance between hierarchical Sb2S3 hollow microspheres with other reported Sb2S3 in studies as anode materials for LIBs

Synthesis method Samples Voltage range (V) Current density (mA g−1) Capacity (mAh g−1) (cycle number)
Hydrothermal reaction [16] Sb2S3 0.01–3.0 50 914(1)–175(10)
Two-step oxidation-sulfuration route [18] Sb2S3 0.01–3.0 100 1187.2(1)–548(100)
Hydrothermal reaction [50] Sb2S3 0–2.5 400 1049(1)–286(20)
Hydrothermal reaction [51] Sb2S3 0.01–3.0 50 1070(1)–367(25)
Three-step wet-chemical synthesis method [34] rGO-Sb2S3 0–2.5 250 880(1)–720(50)
Solvothermal treatment [52] Sb2S3/C 0.01–2.5 100 1084(1)–960(30)
Hydrothermal reaction and mechanical milling [53] Sb2S3-graphite 0.01–2.8 1000 720(1)–656(100)
Solid-state routes [54] Sb2S3/C 0–2.5 100 757(1)–600(100)
Present work: hydrothermal reaction Sb2S3 0.01–2.0 1000 1185(1)–469(100)