Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 22;10(2):28. doi: 10.1007/s40820-017-0178-9

Table 1.

Comparison of CuNi/C glucose sensor with previously reported Ni-based non-enzymatic glucose sensors

Electrode composition Working potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) Sensitivity mA (mM−1 cm−2) Linear range (µM) Detection limit (µM) Self-supported or not
CuNi/MWCNTs [38] 0.450 1.4702 0.962–5000 0.0025 No
CuNi/MWCNTs [37] 0.575 2.4370 2000–8000 0.0250 Yes
CuNi [35] 0.550 0.01916 7–23670 2.3000 Yes
CuNi [36] 0.600 1.5909 10–3200 5.0 Yes
This work 0.540 17.1203 0.2–2720.6 0.06667 Yes