Table 5.
Characteristic | Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
Model 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Functional knowledge of HIV prevention strategiesa |
Overall concern about contracting HIV, that is, perceived riskb |
Had CASc with ≥2 men in the past 3 months |
Tested for HIV in the past year | |
aOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | |
Birth cohort (age in years) | ||||
1928–1959 (56–87) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
1960–1969 (46–55) | 1.4 [1.0, 2.0] | 1.0 [0.7, 1.4] | 1.7 [0.9, 3.0] | 1.1 [0.7, 1.6] |
1970–1979 (36–45) | 1.6 [1.1, 2.5] | 1.0 [0.6, 1.5] | 1.1 [0.5, 2.5] | 1.4 [0.8, 2.3] |
1980–1989 (26–35) | 1.7 [1.1, 2.5] | 1.4 [0.9, 2.1] | 2.8 [1.4, 5.5] | 1.6 [1.0, 2.7] |
1990–1997 (18–25) | 1.6 [1.1, 2.4] | 1.1 [0.8, 1.7] | 1.6 [0.8, 3.3] | 1.3 [0.8, 2.2] |
Race/Ethnicity | ||||
Non-Hispanic White | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Non-Hispanic non-Whitec | 0.6 [0.3, 0.9] | 1.8 [1.2, 2.9] | 0.9 [0.4, 2.0] | 1.6 [0.9, 2.8] |
Hispanic | 0.7 [0.5, 1.0] | 2.8 [1.8, 4.1] | 0.7 [0.4, 1.4] | 2.7 [1.6, 4.5] |
Educational level | ||||
Associate’s/Technical degree or lowerd | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Bachelor’s degree | 2.0 [1.5, 2.7] | 0.7 [0.5, 0.9] | 0.8 [0.5, 1.3] | 1.0 [0.7, 1.4] |
Master’s/Doctoral degree | 2.6 [1.9, 3.6] | 0.7 [0.5, 0.9] | 0.7 [0.4, 1.3] | 1.1 [0.8, 1.7] |
Sexual orientation | ||||
Homosexual/Gay | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Bisexual/Othere | 0.6 [0.4, 0.9] | 1.0 [0.7, 1.4] | 1.0 [0.5, 1.7] | 0.8 [0.5, 1.2] |
Relationship status | ||||
Single | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Have a primary partnerf | 1.0 [0.8, 1.3] | 0.5 [0.4, 0.6] | 0.8 [0.5, 1.2] | 1.0 [0.7, 1.3] |
Functional knowledge of HIV prevention strategiesa | – | 1.0 [1.0, 1.1] | 1.3 [1.1, 1.4] | 1.1 [1.0, 1.1] |
Overall concern about contracting HIV, that is, perceived riskb | – | – | 1.1 [1.0, 1.1] | 1.1 [1.1, 1.2] |
Had CAS with ≥2 men in the past 3 months | – | – | – | 3.3 [2.1, 5.2] |
Note. aOrdinal index created by summing the number of correct responses to questions used to elicit information regarding functional knowledge of HIV prevention strategies (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). bResponses to this question collected as an ordinal measure with 0 representing the least amount of concern and 10 representing the greatest amount of concern. cIncludes 21 non-Hispanic Black/African American, 13 Asian, 8 Native American/Alaskan Native, 1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 22 others. dIncludes 89 with an Associate’s/Technical degree, 171 with some college education, 48 with a high school diploma or General Educational Development (GED), and 7 with some high school education. eIncludes 102 bisexual, 7 heterosexual/straight, 11 questioning/unsure, 2 queer, and 2 others. fDescribed to participants as “Someone you feel committed to above all others. You might call this person your boyfriend, partner, significant other, spouse, or husband.” Includes 324 in a monogamous relationship, 122 in an open relationship with restrictions, and 25 in an open relationship without restrictions. CAS = condomless anal sex; aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Bolded terms indicate P-value < 0.05.