Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;12(6):1824–1834. doi: 10.1177/1557988318790875

Table 5.

Factors Independently Associated With Analytic Outcomes Among 800 Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men, United States, August–September 2015.

Characteristic Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Functional knowledge of HIV prevention strategiesa
Overall concern about contracting HIV, that is, perceived riskb
Had CASc with ≥2 men in the past 3 months
Tested for HIV in the past year
aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
Birth cohort (age in years)
 1928–1959 (56–87) Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 1960–1969 (46–55) 1.4 [1.0, 2.0] 1.0 [0.7, 1.4] 1.7 [0.9, 3.0] 1.1 [0.7, 1.6]
 1970–1979 (36–45) 1.6 [1.1, 2.5] 1.0 [0.6, 1.5] 1.1 [0.5, 2.5] 1.4 [0.8, 2.3]
 1980–1989 (26–35) 1.7 [1.1, 2.5] 1.4 [0.9, 2.1] 2.8 [1.4, 5.5] 1.6 [1.0, 2.7]
 1990–1997 (18–25) 1.6 [1.1, 2.4] 1.1 [0.8, 1.7] 1.6 [0.8, 3.3] 1.3 [0.8, 2.2]
Race/Ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Non-Hispanic non-Whitec 0.6 [0.3, 0.9] 1.8 [1.2, 2.9] 0.9 [0.4, 2.0] 1.6 [0.9, 2.8]
 Hispanic 0.7 [0.5, 1.0] 2.8 [1.8, 4.1] 0.7 [0.4, 1.4] 2.7 [1.6, 4.5]
Educational level
 Associate’s/Technical degree or lowerd Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Bachelor’s degree 2.0 [1.5, 2.7] 0.7 [0.5, 0.9] 0.8 [0.5, 1.3] 1.0 [0.7, 1.4]
 Master’s/Doctoral degree 2.6 [1.9, 3.6] 0.7 [0.5, 0.9] 0.7 [0.4, 1.3] 1.1 [0.8, 1.7]
Sexual orientation
 Homosexual/Gay Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Bisexual/Othere 0.6 [0.4, 0.9] 1.0 [0.7, 1.4] 1.0 [0.5, 1.7] 0.8 [0.5, 1.2]
Relationship status
 Single Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Have a primary partnerf 1.0 [0.8, 1.3] 0.5 [0.4, 0.6] 0.8 [0.5, 1.2] 1.0 [0.7, 1.3]
Functional knowledge of HIV prevention strategiesa 1.0 [1.0, 1.1] 1.3 [1.1, 1.4] 1.1 [1.0, 1.1]
Overall concern about contracting HIV, that is, perceived riskb 1.1 [1.0, 1.1] 1.1 [1.1, 1.2]
Had CAS with ≥2 men in the past 3 months 3.3 [2.1, 5.2]

Note. aOrdinal index created by summing the number of correct responses to questions used to elicit information regarding functional knowledge of HIV prevention strategies (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). bResponses to this question collected as an ordinal measure with 0 representing the least amount of concern and 10 representing the greatest amount of concern. cIncludes 21 non-Hispanic Black/African American, 13 Asian, 8 Native American/Alaskan Native, 1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 22 others. dIncludes 89 with an Associate’s/Technical degree, 171 with some college education, 48 with a high school diploma or General Educational Development (GED), and 7 with some high school education. eIncludes 102 bisexual, 7 heterosexual/straight, 11 questioning/unsure, 2 queer, and 2 others. fDescribed to participants as “Someone you feel committed to above all others. You might call this person your boyfriend, partner, significant other, spouse, or husband.” Includes 324 in a monogamous relationship, 122 in an open relationship with restrictions, and 25 in an open relationship without restrictions. CAS = condomless anal sex; aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

Bolded terms indicate P-value < 0.05.