Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 17;10:4695–4708. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S178271

Table 1.

Main characteristics of eligible studies in the meta-analysis

Study, year Disease type Country Study type Included period No. of cases Male/ female Age (years) Survival type Cutoff value Cutoff selection Follow- up MVA NOS score

Zhang et al 201524 UTCC China R 2006–2008 187 85/102 median: 70 OS, CSS 1.45 ROC ≥5 years yes 7
Liu et al 201625 BC China R 2000–2013 296 250/46 mean: 61.71 CSS, RFS 1.6 ROC ≥5 years yes 7
He et al 201733 RCC China R 2000–2012 895 600/295 mean: 51.44 OS 1.47 ROC ≥5 years yes 8
Liu et al 201726 BC China R 2009–2013 189 165/24 NA OS, PFS, CSS 1.55 ROC ≥5 years yes 7
Koparal et al 201823 RCC Turkey R 2010–2016 162 102/60 mean:56.5 OS, DFS 1.4 ROC ≥5 years yes 6
Niwa et al 201832 BC China R 2000–2015 364 294/70 median: 71 RFS, PFS 1.6 NA ≥5 years yes 8
Shang et al 201834 BC China R 2004–2011 470 354/188 median: 70 OS, CSS 1.68 ROC ≥5 years yes 8
Fukushima et al 201831 UTCC Japan R 2003–2016 105 74/31 median: 74 OS, DFS 1.24 ROC ≥5 years yes 6

Abbreviations: BC, bladder carcinoma; CSS, cancer-specific survival; DFS, disease-free survival; MVA, multivariate analysis; NA, not available; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; R, retrospectively; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RFS, recurrence-free survival; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve; UTCC, upper tract urothelial carcinoma