Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 6;121(3):636–646. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.066

Table 3.

Linear model of conditioned-pain-modulation effect (% change in PPT at 15 s) for participants with conditioning tolerance 20 s (n=108). DSM-Anxiety, anxiety t-score Achenbach Youth Self-Report scale; HUI-3, Health Utilities Index Mark 3; PCS, pain catastrophising scale; PPT, pressure pain threshold; SE, standard error

Variables Step 1 (n=108)
Step 2 (n=108)
Step 3 (n=96)
B SE B β P B SE B β P B SE B β P
Baseline PPT –27 7.1 –0.35 <0.001 –30 7.9 –0.39 <0.001 –35 8.6 –0.43 <0.001
Immersion time –1.9 1.5 –0.12 0.19 –1.7 1.5 –0.10 0.27 –0.16 1.6 –0.01 0.92
Extremely premature status –1.8 9.0 –0.02 0.84 2.6 9.7 0.02 0.79
Sex –8.9 9.3 –0.09 0.34 –14 10 –0.14 0.19
Pain (HUI-3 ranking) –5.4 7.5 0.08 0.47
Regular analgesics 21 24 0.09 0.38
Catastrophising (PCS) –0.58 0.56 –0.13 0.30
DSM-Anxiety (Ach) –0.57 0.59 –0.12 0.33
Regular psychotropics 65 23 0.29 0.01
R2 0.15 0.16 0.29
F for R2 F2,105=9.3; P=0.001 F4,103=4.8; P=0.001 F9,87=3.9; P=0.001