Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Haematol. 2017 Jul 5;182(4):583–586. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14820

Table I.

Response outcomes.

IC
Response R-InO (n=166) R-B (n=137) R-G (n=35) Total (n=172)
ORR,* n (%) [95% CI] 68 (41) [33–49] 66 (48) [40–57] 9 (26) [12–43] 75 (44) [36–51]
CR 21 (13) 23 (17) 0 23 (13)
unCR 5 (3) 5 (4) 0 5 (3)
PR 28 (17) 26 (19) 2 (6) 28 (16)
unPR 14 (8) 12 (9) 7 (20) 19 (11)
SD 18 (11) 7 (5) 5 (14) 12 (7)
PD 64 (39) 46 (34) 16 (46) 62 (36)
Missing 15 (9) 17 (12) 5 (14) 22 (13)

Median (95% CI) DOR, months 11.6 (7.8–NR) 7.2 (6.5–10.8) 3.0 (0.9–NR) 6.9 (5.5–10.8)

CI=confidence interval; CR=complete response; DOR=duration of response; IC=investigator’s choice (rituximab plus bendamustine [R-B] or rituximab plus gemcitabine [R-G]); NR=not reported; ORR=objective response rate; PD=disease progression; PR=partial response; R-InO=inotuzumab plus rituximab; SD=stable disease; unCR=unconfirmed complete response; unPR=unconfirmed partial response.

*

ORR=CR+unCR+PR+unPR; difference in response between R-InO and IC arms (P=0.714 for ORR based on the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test).

1 patient in the R-InO and 1 patient in the R-B group had an indeterminate response.

Confirmed and unconfirmed CR/PR; HR=0.76 (0.47–1.25); P=0.142 for difference in DOR between arms.