Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2016 Aug 23;61(18):6684–6706. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/18/6684

Table I.

Measured CT number (in HU) of the ROIs and the background on CT images shown in Figure 1. The indices of ROIs are marked in Fig. 1(a). The indices of scenarios are marked in Fig. 1(b). The R-RMSEs are calculated by Eq. (10) with the ground truth obtained from the full-scan FBP images. The proposed SPIR method and TVR are applied on low-energy CT scans with different numbers of views. Note that, although the contrast rods have different linear attenuation coefficients at two different x-ray energies, their CT numbers in HU may be similar on the CT images of the two scans.

ROI High-E CT
(First scan)
Low-E CT
(Ground truth)
Low-E CT via SPIR Low-E CT via TVR
Number of
views
655 N/A 655 50 20 10 50 20 10

Scenario I 2 −58 −58 −59 −59 −60 −61 −59 −60 −46
4 127 127 127 127 127 125 128 128 114
6 62 63 63 63 63 65 63 61 51
8 −113 −112 −113 −114 −114 −114 −114 −112 −95

II 3 508 1017 1017 1017 1016 1015 1018 1016 1004
7 508 850 850 850 849 847 851 850 836

III 1 0 −87 −88 −88 −87 −83 −87 −85 −69
5 1 94 96 96 96 92 95 95 87

Background 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 6

R-RMSE (%) 0.42 0.50 0.60 1.33 0.48 0.61 6.18