Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1131–1144. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1043-6

Table 1.

Distribution of Unimpaired Participants and Persons with Aphasia (PWA) by Age and Education Subgroups

Male Female
Unimpaired Participants
Age (in year) Low Education High Education Low Education High Education Sub-total
18 – 39 12 12 10 13 47
40 – 59 15 9 12 12 48
60 or above 11 15 22 6 54
Sub-total 38 36 44 31 (149)
Persons with Aphasia
18 – 39 3 (1 Wernicke’s + 1 Broca’s + 1 Global) 2 (1 Transcortical motor + 1 Isolation) 2 (2 Anomic) 1 (1 Transcortical motor) 8
40 – 59 47 (26 Anomic + 4 Transcortical sensory + 11 Broca’s + 5 Transcortical motor + 1 Global) 5 (4 Anomic + 1 Transcortical sensory) 15 (11 Anomic + 1 Broca’s + 3 Transcortical motor) 1 (1 Transcortical motor) 68
60 or above 10 (5 Anomic + 1 Transcortical sensory + 1 Broca’s + 3 Transcortical motor) 3 (3 Anomic) 10 (5 Anomic + 1 Wernicke’s + 2 Broca’s + 1 Transcortical motor + 1 Isolation) 6 (4 Anomic + 1 Broca’s + 1 Global) 29
Sub-total 60 10 27 8 (105)

Note. Higher or lower than secondary school for the two younger groups, and higher or low than primary school for the oldest group, i.e., at least 14 years as higher education for the two younger groups and at least 7 years as higher education for the elderly group. The high illiteracy rate in native Cantonese elderly speakers in Hong Kong (and in Mainland China as well as many Chinese oversea communities) limited our application of the same high-low education criterion for all participant groups. According to Hong Kong SAR Government (2003), over half of the Hong Kong population during 1970s had only attained primary school education; the percentage of was even higher prior to that. Furthermore, over the decades, many jobs now requiring tertiary education qualification previously only required secondary school education. We believe that education and working experience could associate with language abilities of our elderly group participants. This had led us to draw this equivalence (of 7 years of education for the oldest group is comparable to 14 years of education for the two younger groups, in terms of language abilities).