Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 24;9:4419. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06726-9

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Summary of subjects’ performance in the center-out reaching task, visuomotor rotation = 60°. a Comparison of RMSE, BIAS, and √VAR for all subjects. On the left are values from individual subjects in the identity context; on the right are the values observed from behavior in the remapped context. Similar to the timing and length production tasks, subjects had higher error and were more biased towards the mean than was predicted assuming no MTN. Variability was also substantially increased in all subjects (***: p < 0.001, Wilcoxon two-sided signed-rank test). b Fitting the observer-actor model independently across the two contexts resulted higher values of σpre in the remapped context, reflecting additional reliance on prior information consistent with a late inference strategy. Values for σpost were also substantially increased. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals estimated using a bootstrap procedure (n = 1000)