Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 31;22(11):5354–5366. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13808

Figure 7.

Figure 7

MiR‐95‐5p directly targets HDAC2/8. HDAC2/8 were predicted potential targets of miR‐95‐5p. Alignment of HDAC2/8 3′‐UTR miR‐95‐5p were shown (A). A luciferase reporter carrying the 3′‐UTR of HDAC2/8 or mutant HDAC2/8 in which the binding site of miR‐95‐5p were mutated (Luc‐HDAC2/8‐UTR‐mut) was introduced into 293T cells along with negative miR‐control (NC), miR‐95‐5p. The cells were harvested 48 h later for luciferase assays (B, C). Quantitative data are presented as means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments, ***P < 0.001