Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 24;16:289. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1666-5

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of pregnant women in different GDM subgroups

GDM-resistance P value GDM-dysfunction P value GDM-mix P value GDM-normal P value All GDM P value NGT
Participants (n) 35 (17.0% of GDM) 43 (20.9% of GDM) 79 (38.3% of GDM) 49 (23.8% of GDM) 206 250
Age (years) 31.0 (7.5) > 0.999 31.0 (6.0) 0.021 32.0 (6.0) < 0.001 31.0 (4.0) 0.824 32.0 (5.0) < 0.001 29.0 (5.0)
Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2) 21.5 (3.2) 0.231 21.6 (3.2) 0.405 23.2 (4.0) < 0.001 20.7 (3.3) > 0.999 22.0 (3.7) < 0.001 20.8 (3.7)
Maternal BMI (kg/m2) 23.1 (4.0) 0.071 22.2 (2.9) 0.45 24.5 (4.3) < 0.001 21.3 (3.3) > 0.999 23.2 (3.7) < 0.001 21.8 (3.4)
Gestational age at weight measuring (weeks) 13.3 (3.5) 13.7 (3.3) 13.9 (2.9) 13.9 (2.4) 13.7 (2.8) 0.073 14.0 (3.6)
Maternal BMI change (kg/m2) 0.8 (0.9) 1.1 (1.1) 0.8 (1.3) 0.8 (0.8) 0.8 (1.0) 0.969 0.8 (1.1)
ALT (U/L) 13 (7.5) 14.5 (13.0) 13 (10.0) 12 (8.5) 13 (10.8) 0.753 13 (11.0)
History of hypertension (n) 0 0 4 (5.1) 2 (4.1) 6 (2.9) 0.007 0
Smoking before or during pregnancy (n) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nulliparous (n) 25 (71.4) 27 (62.8) 53 (67.1) 32 (65.3) 137 (66.5) 0.173 181 (72.4)

Data are median (IQR) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables

Differences between GDM subgroups and women with NGT were evaluated with the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher exact test for categorical variables

When the P value was significant (< 0.05), Dunn’s multiple comparisons test or χ2 or Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate the difference between each GDM subtype and NGT group. P values for pairwise comparisons were adjusted by Bonferroni correction