Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 25.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Apr 4;22(7):1218–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.03.027

1:

Patient characteristics before and after propensity score matching.

Study cohort without propensity score matching Patients matched by propensity score

All patients, n=169 Chemo-group,
n=121
HSCT group,
n=48 (%)
p Chemo-group,
n=41
HSCT group,
n=41
p
Median age diagnosis (median, IQR) 59 (50–68) 62 (52–70) 55 (47–62) 0.002 56 (49–65) 56 (52–62) 0.48
WBC at diagnosis (median, IQR) 11.6 (3.8–29.7) 12 (4–28.2) 9 (3.1–36.75) 0.99 9.8 (4.9–19.4) 11.3 (4.2–51.4) 0.24
Platelet count at diagnosis (median, IQR) 45 (25–74) 45 (25–71) 45 (22.5–83) 0.99 43 (30–79) 52 (31–91) 0.73
BM blast at diagnosis (median, IQR) 43 (12–74) 46 (13–75) 32.5 (6.5–63.5) 0.18 58 (28–82) 32 (7–64) 0.07
Cytogenetics at diagnosis 164/169 119/121 45/48
  Diploid 128 (78%) 95 (79.8%) 33 (73.3%) 34(85%) 29(74.4%)
  Other 36 (22%) 24 (20.2%) 12 (26.7%) 0.40 6(15%) 10(25.6%) 0.13
No of FLT3-ITD mutations at diagnosis 163/169 116/121 47/48
  1 130 (79.8%) 95 (81.9%) 35 (74.5%) 33(80.5%) 31(75.6%)
  >1 33 (20.2%) 21 (18.1%) 12 (25.5%) 0.29 8(19.5%) 10(24.4%) 0.56
FLT3-ITD allelic ratio at diagnosis(median, IQR) 0.34 (0.11–0.48) 0.35 (0.12–0.49) 0.3 (0.04–0.48) 0.29 0.18 (0.04–0.45) 0.32 (0.05–0.48) 0.46
FLT3-ITD allelic ration ≥0.3 at diagnosis 163/169 116/121 47/48
  Yes 88 (54%) 65 (56%) 23 (48.9%) 19(46.3%) 22(53.7%)
  No 75 (46%) 51 (44%) 24 (51.1%) 0.49 22(53.7%) 19(46.3%) 0.44
FLT3-ITD allelic ration ≥0.5 at diagnosis 163/169 116/121 47/48
  Yes 37 (22.7%) 29 (25%) 8 (17%) 9(22%) 7(17.1%)
  No 126 (77.3%) 87 (75%) 39 (83%) 0.31 32(78%) 34(82.9%) 0.62
Presence of NPM1 mutation
  Yes 56 (33.1%) 37 (30.6%) 19 (39.6%) 18(43.9%) 17(41.5%)
  No 57 (33.7%) 42 (34.7%) 15 (31.3%) 12(29.3%) 14(34.1%)
  Unknown 56 (33.1%) 42 (34.7%) 14 (29.2%) 0.55 11(26.8%) 10(24.4%) 0.85
Use of FLT3 inhibitors as induction/consolidation
  Yes 37 (21.9%) 27 (22.3%) 10 (20.8%) 10(24.4%) 8(19.5%)
  No 132 (78.2%) 94 (77.7%) 38 (79.2%) 1.0 31(75.6%) 33(80.5%) 0.53
Year of diagnosis after 2008
  Yes 106 (62.7%) 68 (56.2%) 38 (79.2%) 31(75.6%) 31(75.6%)
  No 63 (37.3%) 53 (43.8%) 10 (20.8%) 0.01 10(24.4%) 10(24.4%) 1.00
Use of high dose cytarabine regimen before HCT
  Yes 113(66.9%) 71(58.7%) 42(87.5%) 34(82.9%) 35(85.4%)
  No 56(33.1%) 50(41.3%) 6(12.5%) <0.001 7(17.1%) 6(14.6%) 0.65
ECOG performance status at diagnosis 155/169 110/121 45/48 36/41 38/41
  0–1 134 (86.5%) 92 (83.6%) 42 (93.3%) 31(86.1%) 36(94.7%)
  2–3 55 (13.5%) 18 (16.4%) 3 (6.7%) 0.1 5 (13.9%) 2 (5.3%) 0.2

Abbreviations: HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IQR, interquartile range; BM, bone marrow.