Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 25.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Apr 4;22(7):1218–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.03.027

Table 4:

Univariate analyses for relapse free and overall survival after propensity score matching*.

RFS OS

Variable HR 95%CI p HR 95%CI p
Age 0.99 0.96–1.02 0.54 1.01 0.97 , 1.05 0.66
Log (WBC) at diagnosis 0.97 0.65–1.47 0.90 1.05 0.69–1.60 0.80
Log (Platelet) count at diagnosis 1.17 0.62–2.19 0.63 1.00 0.52–1.92 0.99
BM blast at diagnosis 1.00 0.98–1.02 0.97 1.00 0.98–1.02 0.96
Cytogenetics at diagnosis (Diploid vs. other) 4.00 0.85–18.84 0.08 4.00 0.85–18.84 0.08
Log (FLT3-ITD allelic ratio) at diagnosis 0.93 0.62–1.37 0.70 0.92 0.61–1.38 0.68
FLT3-ITD allelic ration ≥0.3 at diagnosis (Yes vs. no) 1.40 0.44–4.41 0.57 1.40 0.44–4.41 0.57
Presence of NPM1 mutation
Yes vs. no 0.77 0.26–2.31 0.64 0.79 0.24–2.64 0.70
Unknown vs. no 0.67 0.15–3.05 0.61 0.52 0.10–2.63 0.43
Year of diagnosis after 2008 (Yes vs. no) 1.50 0.25–8.98 0.66 4.00 0.45–35.79 0.22
Allogeneic HSCT (Yes vs. no) 0.55 0.27–1.10 0.09 0.58 0.28–1.22 0.15
Use of high dose cytarabine (Yes vs. no) 0.33 0.03–3.20 0.34 0.33 0.03–3.20 0.34

*

Number of FLT3-ITD mutation and the use of FLT3 inhibitors were not analyzed for their impact on RFS and OS due to sample size<10 in groups.

Abbreviations: RFS, relapse-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; BM, bone marrow.