Table 3.
Assessment of study quality included in the meta-analysis by Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control studies
| Source | Selection | Comparabilitya | Exposure | Total scores | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5A | 5B | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Mourouti et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | – | 8 |
| Tajaddini et al. | * | * | – | * | * | * | * | * | – | 7 |
| Yun et al | * | * | – | – | * | * | * | * | – | 6 |
| Adzersen et al. | * | * | – | * | * | * | – | * | – | 6 |
| Chatenoud et al. | * | * | – | * | * | * | – | * | * | 7 |
| Levi et al. | * | – | – | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |
| LaVecchia et al | * | * | – | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
1 Is the case definition adequate? 2 Representativeness of the cases. 3 Selection of controls. 4 Definition of controls. 5 Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis. 6 Ascertainment of exposure. 7 Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls. 8 Non-response rate
aStudies that controlled for age and traditional risk factors received one score, whereas studies that controlled for other important confounders received an additional score