Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 25;13(10):e0205913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205913

Table 7. Effect of dietary xylose concentration and collection period on urine xylose and metabolite excretion.

Collection period, d 5–7 12–14 19–21
Dietary treatment, % xylose inclusion 0 2 4 8 0 2 4 8 0 2 4 8 Pooled SEM T×C1
P-value
Urinary excretion, g/d
    Xylose* 0.51g 7.04f 21.59d 50.06a 0.49g 6.01f 16.25e 31.53c 0.83g 5.73f 16.06e 38.58b 1.28 < 0.0001
    Threitol* 0.12f 2.73e 6.53d 15.96a 0.08f 2.36e 5.61d 10.95c 0.27f 2.46e 6.01d 13.46b 0.45 0.0008
    Xylitol* 0.01f 0.07e 0.16cd 0.27b 0.01f 0.06ef 0.14d 0.23b 0.04ef 0.05ef 0.21bc 0.41a 0.02 0.0021
    Xylulose* 0.02e 0.08d 0.12c 0.20a 0.02e 0.08d 0.13c 0.17b 0.02e 0.07d 0.13c 0.21a 0.007 0.0021
    Xylonic acid 0.000cd 0.001cd 0.009cd 0.059a 0.000d 0.001de 0.009c 0.033b 0.000d 0.001d 0.008ce 0.035b 0.003 < 0.0001

Pigs (n = 12/treatment) were housed individually in metabolism crates and fed diets containing either 0, 2, 4, or 8% D-xylose at 4% of BW. Urine was collected during 3 different periods representing increasing adaptation time to treatment diets.

a-gWithin a row, means without a common superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05)

1Dietary treatment × collection period interaction (T×C)

*Treatment is significant at P < 0.01

Treatment linear contrast is significant at P < 0.01

Collection period is significant at P < 0.01