Table 5. Negative binomial hurdle model for pupae Ae. aegypti in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan (N = 436).
Est | SE | Exp(Est) | 95% CI** | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Negative binomial model* | |||||
Season (wet vs. dry) | -0.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.3–2.0 | |
Location x Function | |||||
Out vs. In (water storage) | -1.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1–0.9 | |
Out vs. In (other receptacle) | 2.2 | 0.9 | 8.8 | 1.4–56.3 | |
Out vs. In (discarded) | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 0.3–21.5 | |
Logistic regression model | |||||
Season (wet vs. dry) | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 1.1–4.0 |
* Zero-truncated
** 95% CI referring to Exp(Est)