Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 18;19(6):1053–1065. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1053

Table 2. Per Nodule Comparison of Assessed Ablation Zones between Concordant and Discordant Groups Using Visual and Software-Assisted Initial Inspection in 88 HCCs.

Agreement between Two Methods (n = 75) Disagreement between Two Methods (n = 13) P
Results of two inspections before second treatment (%)
 Sufficient margin on both inspections 88.0 (66/75) 0 (0/13) -
 Insufficient margin on both inspections 12.0 (9/75) 0 (0/13) -
 Insufficient margin only on visual inspection 0 (0/75) 38.5 (5/13) -
 Insufficient margin only on software inspection 0 (0/75) 61.5 (8/13) -
Pre-RFA MRI scanner (1.5T vs. 3T) 27:39 7:6 0.58
Lesion size (cm) 1.6 ± 0.6 (0.5, 3.2) 1.8 ± 0.6 (1.0, 3.0) 0.25
Lesion depth (%) 0.31
 Central 53.3 (40/75) 38.5 (5/13)
 Peripheral 46.7 (35/75) 61.5 (8/13)
Lesion location (%) 0.27*
 Left lateral segment 16.0 (12/75) 15.4 (2/13)
 Segment 4 9.3 (7/75) 15.4 (2/13)
 Right lobe 74.7 (56/75) 69.2 (9/13)
Lesion level (%) 0.047
 Upper than hilar 42.7 (32/75) 76.9 (10/13)
 Hilar level 18.7 (14/75) 0 (0/13)
 Lower than hilar 38.7 (29/75) 23.1 (3/13)
Adjacent landmark (%) 0.70
 Present 36.0 (27/88) 23.1 (3/13)
 Absent 64.0 (48/88) 76.9 (10/13)

Values are mean ± standard deviation (range). *Comparison between right lobe and left lobe, Comparison between upper than hilar level and hilar or lower than hilar level. p values less than 0.05 indicate statistical significance.