Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 25.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 17;75:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.08.005

Table 4.

Yield number of tests, and cost per patient according to the sequence of tests for 332 patients suspected of having tuberculosis.a

Tests Yield Incremental
yield of culture (%)
Xpert, n (%) LAM, n (%) Induction of
sputum, n (%)
Mycobacterial
culture, n (%)
DST, n (%) Cost/patient ($US)
Xpert Spotb
 Culture
24.3 1.2 88 (26.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 48 (14.5) 2 (0.6) 10.5
LAM
 Xpert Spotb
50.9 N/A 73 (22.0) 332 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10.5
LAM
 Xpert Spotb
 Culture
52.1 1.2 73 (22.0) 332 (100) 0 (0) 47 (14.2) 2 (0.6) 12.5
LAM
 Xpert SIc
92.3 N/A 261 (78.6) 332 (100) 188 (56.7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 37.2
Xpert SIc
 Culture
95.0 4.5 332 (100) 0 (0) 244 (73.5) 170 (51.2) 7.5d (2.3) 49.6
LAM
 Xpert SIc
 Culture
95.9 3.6 261 (78.6) 332 (100) 188 (56.7) 160 (48.2) 6d (1.8) 42.0

LAM, urine lateral flow lipoarabinomannan test; DST, drug susceptibility testing by line probe assay; N/A, not applicable.

a

Where multiple tests are shown, it is assumed that testing is performed in series and terminates when a test is positive. Columns represent the proportion of patients who would receive each test if the sequence was followed in this way. Total costs per patient are calculated based on these proportions and the costs of each test.

b

Xpert Spot = test only performed if the patient could produce sputum spontaneously.

c

Xpert SI = includes spontaneously produced sputum and induced sputum.

d

Includes patients where two sputum cultures taken on the same day gave discordant results and it was not possible to determine whether the first or second was positive. For the purposes of evaluation, it was assumed that there was a 50% chance that the first sample was positive in each case.