Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurovirol. 2018 May 17;24(5):549–556. doi: 10.1007/s13365-018-0643-3

Table 2.

Association of the VACS Index and NCI to functional outcomes (n=670)

IADL declinesa PAOFI total scoreb Unemploymentc
Estimate (SE) P Estimate (SE) p OR (CI) p
Intercept 2.78 (0.20) — 6.67 (0.63) — — —
VACS Index [low]d −1.62 (0.25) <0.0001 −1.70 (0.77) 0.03 0.22 (0.12 – 0.38) <0.0001
VACS Index [medium]d −1.30 (0.22) <0.0001 −1.42 (0.69) 0.04 0.34 (0.19 – 0.56) <0.0001
NCI 0.75 (0.19) <0.0001 2.75 (0.58) <0.0001 2.04 (1.40 – 3.00) <0.001
a

Overall model: F (3, 669) = 23.44, p<.0001, Adj R2 = 0.09, pairwise comparisons; Low VACS Index group (compared to medium), Estimate = 0.32, SE = 0.23, p=.31

b

Overall model: F (3, 669) = 10.39, p<.0001, Adj R2 = 0.04,, pairwise comparisons; Low VACS Index group (compared to medium), Estimate = 0.28, SE = 0.67, p=.91

c

Overall model: X2(3)=52.22, p<.0001, pairwise comparisons; Low VACS Index group (compared to medium), OR=0.65(0.44–0.96), p=.03

d

Reference group = high VACS Index