Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2018 Oct 4;54(11):2016–2031. doi: 10.1037/dev0000557

Table 5.

Infant Gaze - Mother Gaze: Weighted Lag Analyses for Standard Care (SC) and Family Nurture Intervention (FNI) and their Differences (Δ)

Infant Gaze β SEβ p
SC IG → IG 1.365 .047 <.001
MG → IG .067 .046 .148
FNI IG → IG 1.431 .041 <.001
MG → IG .024 .042 .561
Group .005 .179 .979
Δ IG * Group → IG .062 .062 .322
MG * Group → IG −.043 .062 .491
Mother Gaze β SE6 p
MG → MG1 .642 .056 <.001
IG → MG1 .100 .082 .224
I Sex .013 .206 .951
SC MG * Sex → MG2 −.104 .077 .176
IG * Sex → MG2 .161 .114 .159
FNI MG → MG .378 .055 <.001
IG → MG .358 .073 <.001
Group −.066 .206 .750
MG * Group → MG3 −.264 .078 <.001
Δ IG * Group → MG3 .258 .110 .019
MG * Group * Sex → MG4 .371 .105 <.001
IG * Group * Sex → MG4 −.443 .152 .004
MG*Group*Sex →MG SC FNI SC vs. FNI
β p β p β p
Male infant .642 < .001 .378 <.001 .264 <.001
Female infant .538 <.001 .645 <.001 −.107 .128
Male vs. Female .104 .176 −.267 <.001
MG*Group*Sex →IG SC FNI SC vs. FNI
β p β p β p
Male infant .099 .224 .358 <.001 −.258 .019
Female infant .260 .001 .075 .268 .185 .076
Male vs. Female −.161 .159 .283 .005

Note. See Table 1 footnotes for explanation of terms.

1

MG → MG; IG → MG: contingency term alone represents the baseline effect for males.

2

MG * Sex → MG; IG * Sex → MG: effect of being female on contingency (female 1, male 0).

3

MG * Group → MG; IG * Group → MG: effect of being in FNI group (FNI = 1, SC = 0).

4

MG * Group * Sex → MG; IG * Group*Sex → MG: 3-way interaction among prior mother gaze, group, and sex, for mother self-contingency (β = .371, p < .001), and mother interactive contingency (β = −.443, p < .001). Tables below show betas and significance tests of differences relevant to the 3-way interaction effects.