Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 25;8:15803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33622-5

Table 2.

WGS analysis methods evaluated in this study.

WGS analysis method Type of input data Reference-based method Adjusted for recombination or not (method used) Whole genome alignment length before recombination correction (bps) Number of nucleotide positions available for phylogenetic reconstruction after recombination correction (bps)
kSNP (k-mer–based) Contigs Reference free No
Roary Gene annotations (from contigs) Reference free Yes (ClonalFrameML) NmB – 1117836; NmC–1347579 NmB – 237583; NmC–496020
Parsnp Contigs Reference-based Yes (ClonalFrameML) NmB – 1331883; NmC–1547169 NmB −265861; NmC–503939
SNIPPY.(hq SNP-based) Raw reads Reference-based Yes (ClonalFrameML) NmB – 2283986; NmC–2200611 NmB – 605744; NmC–827012
cgMLST Contigs Reference-based (core genome MLST genes) No
MASH (k-mer–based) Raw reads Reference free No
BEAST Parsnp/SNIPPY alignment Reference-based Yes (ClonalFrameML) NmB (CC32 isolates; n = 24) – 2127589; NmC (CC11 isolates; n = 71) – 1764302 NmB – 1709526; NmC –1168741