Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 22;42(5):355–363. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0041

Table 2. Descriptions of the studies for screening of asymptomatic coronary artery disease in patients with diabetic mellitus.

Variable DIAD (2009) FACTOR-64 (2014) DADDY-D (2015)
No. of patients 1,123 899 520
Design of study Randomized, multicenter Randomized, multicenter Randomized, multicenter
Countries USA and Canada USA Italy
Duration of follow-up, yr 5 4 3.6
Screening method SPECT CCTA ETT
Results of screening
 No. of screening arm 561 452 262
 Positive screening 15 (83/561) 17 (76/452) 8 (20/262)
 CAG related to positive screening 4 (25/561) 8 (36/452) 6 (17/262)
 Proportion of patients with positive screening who performed CAG 30 (25/83) 47 (36/76) 85 (17/20)
Outcomes
 Cardiovascular death
  Screening 1.4 (8/561) 1.5 (7/452) 0.4 (1/262)
  No screening 1.2 (7/562) 1.8 (8/447) 1.9 (5/258)
 Nonfatal myocardial infarction
  Screening 1.3 (7/561) 1.5 (7/452) 4.2 (11/262)
  No screening 1.7 (10/562) 1.8 (8/447) 4.7 (12/258)
 Coronary revascularization
  Screening 5.5 (31/561) 5.8 (26/452) 4.6 (12/262)
  No screening 7.8 (44/562) 3.1 (14/447) 8.5 (22/258)

Values are presented as percentage (number/total number).

DIAD, Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics; FACTOR-64, Screening for Asymptomatic Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease among High-Risk Diabetic Patients Using CT Angiography, Following Core 64; DADDY-D, Does Coronary Atherosclerosis Deserve to be Diagnosed Early in Diabetic Patients; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; ETT, exercise tolerance test; CAG, coronary angiography.