Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 22;42(5):442–446. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2017.0090

Table 2. Results of all methods according to the presence of subjective neuropathic symptoms.

Methods Patients with symptomsa Patients with no symptomb
Abnormal Normal Abnormal Normal
Tests
 Pinprick test 6 (12.5) 42 (87.5) 5 (5.7) 83 (94.3)
 SWMEd 9 (18.8) 39 (81.2) 5 (5.7) 83 (94.3)
 Tuning-forkc,e 28 (58.3) 20 (41.7) 25 (28.4) 63 (71.6)
 Ankle reflexe 39 (81.3) 9 (18.7) 48 (54.5) 40 (45.5)
 Any of above 4d 42 (87.5) 6 (12.5) 59 (67.0) 29 (33.0)
 Pinprick test+Tuning-forkf 29 (60.4) 19 (39.6) 25 (28.4) 63 (71.6)
 Pinprick test+Ankle reflexe 39 (81.3) 9 (18.7) 50 (56.8) 38 (43.2)
 SWME+Tuning-forke 29 (60.4) 19 (39.6) 25 (28.4) 63 (71.6)
 SWME+Ankle reflexe 39 (81.3) 9 (18.7) 49 (55.7) 39 (44.3)
 Tuning-fork+Ankle reflexd 42 (87.5) 6 (12.5) 59 (67.0) 29 (33.0)
Questionnaires
 MNSI questionnairef 37 (77.1) 11 (22.9) 8 (9.1) 80 (90.9)
 Total Symptom Scoref 20 (41.7) 28 (58.3) 2 (2.3) 86 (97.7)
 Any of above 2f 37 (77.1) 11 (22.9) 9 (10.2) 79 (89.8)
All 6 abovef 47 (97.9) 1 (2.1) 62 (70.5) 26 (29.5)

Values are presented as number (%).

SWME, 10-g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination; MNSI questionnaire, 15-item self-administered questionnaire in the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument.

aPatients had subjective neuropathic symptoms, bPatients had no subjective neuropathic symptoms, c128-Hz tuning-fork, statistical significance is marked as dP<0.05, eP<0.01, fP<0.001.