Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 11;141(11):3115–3129. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy245

Table 4.

Comparisons of retinal thickness measures at baseline (in µm)a

African Americans Caucasian Americans African Americans versus Caucasian Americans
Mean (SD) µm Mean (SD) µm P-valuea P-valueb
Healthy controls n = 31 n = 61
p-RNFL 97.39 (8.36) 93.10 (10.37) 0.039 NA
T-quadrant p-RNFL 66.21 (10.96) 64.78 (11.04) 0.580 NA
GCIP 75.35 (4.41) 77.03 (5.36) 0.110 NA
INL 43.12 (2.65) 45.57 (2.67) <0.001 NA
ONL 65.78 (6.65) 68.79 (5.32) 0.015 NA
AMT 306.79 (14.48) 314.54 (12.80) 0.007 NA
Multiple sclerosis n = 116 n = 116
p-RNFL 85.60 (15.28) 87.87 (12.70) 0.186 0.216
T-quadrant p-RNFL 51.13 (12.17) 56.52 (14.16) 0.001 0.001
GCIP 67.86 (10.57) 71.15 (8.71) 0.004 0.004
INL 44.70 (3.55) 45.19 (3.12) 0.194 0.183
ONL 66.98 (5.45) 68.07 (6.42) 0.145 0.152
AMT 297.86 (18.82) 304.98 (18.45) 0.002 0.002

aDerived from models adjusted for sex and baseline age.

bDerived from models adjusted for sex, age at baseline, disease duration and history optic neuritis.

AMT = average macular thickness; NA = not applicable; T-quadrant = temporal quadrant. Bold values indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).