Table 5.
(Mean of the answers and CI 95%) | Harm reduction professionals N = 45 |
ER doctors N = 5 |
Pharmacists N = 30 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Health care access of PWUD | 1.62 [1.40; 1.85] |
1.40 [0.72; 2.08] |
0.40 [−0.24; 1.04] |
KW = 11.70
p = 0.003 |
Frequency of drug use | − 0.33 [− 0.68; 0.01] |
0.20 [− 0.36; 0.76] |
0.76 [0.31; 1.21] |
KW = 11.62
p = 0.003 |
Risk of drug-related infection | − 2.16 [− 2.49; − 1.82] |
− 2.00 [− 2.88; − 1.12] |
− 1.70 [− 2.22; − 1.18] |
KW = 2.33 p = 0.312 |
Death by overdose | − 1.73 [− 2.04; − 1.41] |
− 1.00 [− 1.88; − 0.12] |
− 1.30 [− 1.64; −.96] |
KW = 6.82 p = 0.033 |
Social disadvantages of the PWUD | − 0.98 [− 1.74; − 1.30] |
− 0.80 [− 1.84; 0.24] |
− 0.20 [− 0.56; 0.16] |
KW = 10.74
p = 0.005 |
Sharing of used consumption devices | − 1.73 [− 2.24; − 1.23] |
− 2.00 [− 3.24; − 0.76] |
− 2.03 [− 2.51; − 1.56] |
KW = 0.37 p = 0.830 |
Amount of new PWUD | 0.02 [− 0.28; 0.33] |
0.40 [− 0.71; 1.51] |
0.27 [0.03; 0.51] |
KW = 5.30 p = 0.070 |
Number of arrests for drug use | − 0.18 [− 0.53; 0.17] |
0.00 [− 0.39; 0.39] |
− 0.18 [− 0.53; 0.17] |
KW = 1.04 p = 0.594 |
Quietness of the neighborhood | 0.42 [− 0.01; 0.85] |
− 1.20 [− 3.24; 0.84] |
−1.23 [− 1.77; − 0.70] |
KW = 20.091
p < 0.001 |
Amount of drug consumption devices abandoned in public | − 1.84 [− 2.19; − 1.50] |
− 1.20 [− 1.76; − 0.64] |
− 1.27 [− 1.79;− 0.74] |
KW = 6.33
p = 0.042 |
Deal in the neighborhood | − 0.16 [−0.52; 0.21] |
1.00 [− 0.24; 2.24] |
0.33 [− 0.15; 0.82] |
KW = 5.62 p = 0.060 |
Drug consumption in the public space | − 1.77 [− 2.09; − 1.45] |
− 1.20 [− 1.76; − 0.64] |
− 0.87 [− 1.30; − 0.43] |
KW = 12.603
p = 0.002 |
Violence in the neighborhood | − 0.86 [− 1.20; − 0.53] |
0.80 [− 0.24; 1.84] |
0.20 [− 0.21; 0.61] |
KW = 20.51
p < 0.001 |
Global health and quality of life of the PWUD | 1.42 [1.17; 1.67] |
1.00 [0.66; 1.34] |
1.00 [1.00; 1.00] |
KW = 6.12
p = 0.047 |
PWUD persons who use drugs, ER emergency room, GP general practitioners, KW Kruskall-Wallis test
Italic prints: p < 0.05