Table 2.
Negative consequences | Potential symptoms of AD | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zero inflation | Expected count | Zero inflation | Expected count | ||||||||||
Estimate | SE | P | Estimate | SE | P | Estimate | SE | P | Estimate | SE | P | ||
Similarity to MO | |||||||||||||
Age | Baseline | 0.001 | 0.072 | 0.000 | −0.390 | 0.208 | 0.061 | 0.426 | 0.102 | 0.000 | −0.663 | 0.196 | 0.001 |
Δ Across 20 years | 0.802 | 0.731 | 0.273 | 0.280 | 0.880 | 0.750 | 0.888 | 0.192 | 0.000 | 0.965 | 0.068 | 0.000 | |
FA drinker status | Baseline | −0.250 | 0.075 | 0.001 | 0.204 | 0.163 | 0.211 | −0.214 | 0.122 | 0.078 | −0.173 | 0.199 | 0.384 |
Δ Across 20 years | 0.465 | 0.549 | 0.397 | 0.473 | 0.246 | 0.055 | −0.027 | 0.328 | 0.935 | 0.187 | 0.275 | 0.498 | |
MO drinker status | Baseline | 0.284 | 0.081 | 0.000 | −0.120 | 0.160 | 0.453 | −0.231 | 0.089 | 0.874 | 0.175 | 0.148 | 0.237 |
Δ Across 20 years | 0.484 | 0.476 | 0.309 | 0.562 | 0.220 | 0.011 | −0.056 | 0.356 | 0.874 | 0.000 | 0.190 | 0.998 | |
Similarity to MO | Baseline | 0.008 | 0.087 | 0.927 | −0.098 | 0.128 | 0.441 | −0.096 | 0.110 | 0.382 | −0.282 | 0.173 | 0.102 |
Δ Across 20 years | 0.147 | 0.507 | 0.772 | 0.136 | 0.305 | 0.655 | 0.617 | 0.421 | 0.142 | 0.394 | 0.236 | 0.094 | |
Similarity × MO drinker status | Baseline | −0.049 | 0.098 | 0.620 | −0.033 | 0.168 | 0.843 | −0.210 | 0.094 | 0.000 | −0.030 | 0.179 | 0.867 |
Δ Across 20 years | −0.077 | 0.573 | 0.894 | 0.538 | 0.191 | 0.005 | 0.366 | 0.444 | 0.410 | 0.467 | 0.197 | 0.018 | |
Similarity to FA | |||||||||||||
Age | Baseline | 0.400 | 0.079 | 0.000 | −0.352 | 0.318 | 0.269 | 0.376 | 0.119 | 0.002 | −0.619 | 0.199 | 0.002 |
Δ Across 20 years | 0.672 | 0.834 | 0.420 | 0.201 | 0.802 | 0.802 | 0.597 | 0.299 | 0.046 | 0.839 | 0.218 | 0.000 | |
MO drinker status | Baseline | −0.257 | 0.100 | 0.010 | −0.073 | 0.251 | 0.772 | −0.154 | 0.089 | 0.084 | 0.253 | 0.096 | 0.008 |
Δ Across 20 years | 0.531 | 0.527 | 0.313 | 0.624 | 0.307 | 0.042 | −0.072 | 0.182 | 0.692 | 0.008 | 0.173 | 0.963 | |
FA drinker status | Baseline | −0.255 | 0.088 | 0.004 | −0.211 | 0.163 | 0.194 | −0.230 | 0.109 | 0.035 | −0.212 | 0.159 | 0.181 |
Δ Across 20 years | 0.434 | 0.538 | 0.432 | 0.274 | 0.371 | 0.461 | 0.017 | 0.288 | 0.953 | 0.195 | 0.290 | 0.501 | |
Similarity to FA | Baseline | −0.045 | 0.074 | 0.543 | 0.060 | 0.136 | 0.658 | 0.189 | 0.105 | 0.070 | 0.492 | 0.153 | 0.001 |
Δ Across 20 years | 0.129 | 0.552 | 0.815 | 0.187 | 0.350 | 0.593 | −0.805 | 0.220 | 0.000 | −0.568 | 0.274 | 0.038 | |
Similarity × FA drinker status | Baseline | 0.062 | 0.084 | 0.460 | 0.124 | 0.138 | 0.368 | 0.105 | 0.091 | 0.249 | 0.143 | 0.146 | 0.330 |
Δ Across 20 years | −0.202 | 0.507 | 0.691 | −0.483 | 0.239 | 0.043 | −0.075 | 0.264 | 0.776 | −0.082 | 0.210 | 0.698 |
Note. Estimates with an association of P < 0.05 are in bold-face font. MO = Mother, FA = Father, Δ = Change. Standardized estimates are given as logits values. The ‘Zero Inflation’ part of the ZIP model is a logistic regression predicting log odds of a subpopulation of participants who are unable to report non-zero consequences, due to alcohol abstention. The ‘Expected Count’ part of the model is a Poisson regression, estimating the number of expected consequences (i.e. natural log of the expected count) in a subpopulation of participants who are able to report scores of zero and above (i.e. not alcohol abstainers).