Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 17;11:1831–1880. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S176049

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Screening methods for carbapenem-resistant microorganisms.

Notes: 1MHT was the most used phenotypic method in Iranian studies. MHT originally detects KPC, but if zinc sulfate is added to MHT culture media, it can detect MBL.2 It is based on carbapenemase inhibition by betalactamase inhibitors. CDT consists of two disks: a carbapenem and the other combination of a carbapenem and a betalactamase inhibitor. If the disk with inhibitor shows a bigger inhibition zone, the result is considered positive. DDST consists of carbapenem discs at a variable distance to inhibitor discs. The observation of synergy between disks is noted as a positive result. 3These phenotypic methods can detect different Ambler classes. 4CIM is a newer phenotypic method that was introduced in 2015 by van der Zwaluw. A carbapenem disk is inserted in culture media of suspected strain. Then it is transferred to another culture media with known control strain. If the suspected strain contains carbapenemase enzyme, the carbapenem disk has been degraded and the control strain in second culture will grow. 5Some other phenotypic methods like spectrometric assays are also used and have higher sensitivity and specificity, but they are costly and time consuming.

Abbreviations: CDT, combination disk test; CIM, carbapenem inactivation method; DDST, double disk synergy test; ESBL, extended spectrum β-lactamase; KPC, Klebsiella-producing carbapenemase; MBL, metallo-β-lactamase; MHT, modified Hodge test; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.