Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181851. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1851

Table 2. Association of Black and Hispanic Race/Ethnicity, Compared With Non-Hispanic White Race/Ethnicity, With Hemoglobin A1c Trajectory Groups in 1011 Patients.

Modela Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Black Race (n = 128)b Hispanic Ethnicity (n = 140)b
Group 1: Low Baseline and Mild Increases Group 2: Moderate Baseline and Moderate Increases Group 3: Moderate Baseline and Major Increases Group 1: Low Baseline and Mild Increases Group 2: Moderate Baseline and Moderate Increases Group 3: Moderate Baseline and Major Increases
Model 1 1 [Reference] 2.90 (1.88-4.46) 7.98 (4.42-14.38) 1 [Reference] 1.71 (1.17-2.49) 3.29 (1.78-6.08)
Model 2 1 [Reference] 3.00 (1.92-4.67) 9.94 (5.15-19.20) 1 [Reference] 1.67 (1.08-2.58) 3.56 (1.75-7.21)
Model 3 1 [Reference] 2.50 (1.54-4.05) 7.50 (3.68-15.26) 1 [Reference] 1.43 (0.90-2.27) 3.32 (1.60-6.91)
Model 4 1 [Reference] 1.73 (1.04-2.90) 4.54 (2.08-9.89) 1 [Reference] 1.16 (0.71-1.89) 2.24 (1.02-4.92)
a

Model 1 was unadjusted. Model 2 was adjusted for demographic characteristics (age at diagnosis and clinic site). Model 3 further adjusted for body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) z score, insulin regimen, insulin dose, and frequency of blood glucose monitoring. Model 4 further adjusted for socioeconomic position (maximum parental education, household structure, and health insurance type).

b

Self-reported race and ethnicity were collected using 2000 US Census questions and categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and other (Asian, Native American, Pacific Islander, other, and unknown). Respondents who self-reported as other were excluded from these analyses due to small sample size (n = 34).