Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0206295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206295

Table 3. Foetal monitoring methods as predictors of birth outcomes.

Method Predicts perinatal outcomes/foetal distress1 Improves perinatal outcomes1 Predicts mode of delivery Increases operative deliveries Improves
Maternal morbidity/ mortality
Admission test CTG(n = 7)
IA (Doppler, n = 1))
Admission AFI (n = 1)
FAST (n = 3)
rBPP(n = 1)
UADV(n = 2)
Ongoing intrapartum foetal monitoring FHR IA Pinard(n = 6) REFERENCE2
IA Doppler(n = 3)
CTG(n = 11)
Partograph(n = 5)
Adjunctive tests MSAF(n = 7)
FSST(n = 1)
FBS(n = 1)
FPO(n = 1)
UADV(n = 1)

Green = Yes; Red = No; Orange = Unclear (i.e. outcome not reported or the evidence conflicts across studies). AFI = Amniotic fluid index, CTG = cardiotocograph, FAST = Foetal acoustic stimulation test, FBS = Foetal blood sampling, FPO = Foetal pulse oximetry, FSST = Foetal scalp stimulation test, MSAF = Meconium-staining amniotic fluid, rBPP = rapid Biophysical Profile, UADV = Umbilical artery Doppler velocity

1Perinatal outcomes any of the following: Apgar score at 1 or 5 minutes, umbilical cord blood pH/gases, need for neonatal resuscitation, stillbirth (intrapartum/fresh), neonatal deaths before discharge/within 24hours, admission to neonatal care unit, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy

2Pinard was used as a reference test for which Doppler and CTG were compared to.