Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;13(10):e0206613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206613

Table 1. Impact of spatial normalization for [18F]MNI-659 striatal quantification.

[18F]MNI-659 BPND
  WT HET Δ (Genotype) 95% CI of diff Effect size d
MRI template 1.86 ± 0.20 1.06 ± 0.24 0.80 (42.9%)**** +0.533 to +0.962 3.62
PET template 1.93 ± 0.24 1.32 ± 0.13 0.61 (31.8%)**** +0.434 to +0.863 3.16
CT template 1.86 ± 0.29 0.98 ± 0.32 0.88 (47.3%)**** +0.588 to + 1.030 2.88
Δ (PET—MRI) 0.07 (3.7%) 0.25 (23.9%)****      
Δ (MRI—CT) 0.00 (0.0%) 0.08 (7.5%)      
Δ (PET—CT) 0.07 (3.7%) 0.34 (34.7%)****      

Δ (PET—MRI), difference between MRI and PET template-based spatial normalizations; Δ (MRI—CT), difference between MRI and CT template-based spatial normalizations; Δ (PET—CT), difference between PET and CT template-based spatial normalizations; Δ (Genotype), difference between HET and WT Q175 mice; CI of diff, confidence intervals of difference; WT, wild-type; HET, heterozygous.

****p < 0.0001.