Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;7:e35957. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35957

Table 7. Analyses of selection on Vertebrate rhodopsin (rh1) using PAML random sites models.

Model lnL Parameters1 Null P [df]2 Δ AIC§
ω0/p ω1/q ω2/ωp
M0 −49624.89 0.08 - - N/A - 5516.80
M1a −48355.44 0.05 (89%) 1.00 (11%) - M0 0.000 [1] 2979.91
M2a −48355.44 0.05 (89%) 1.00 (3%) 1.00 (8%) M1a 1 [2] 2983.91
M3 −47104.84 0.01 (58%) 0.11 (30%) 0.44 (12%) M0 0.000 [4] 484.71
M7 −46906.24 0.24 1.19 - N/A - 81.51
M8a −46864.60 0.32 3.10 1.00 N/A - 0.230
M8 −46863.49 0.32 2.94 1.14 M7 0.000 [2] 0*
M8a 0.135 [1]

values of each site class are shown are shown for model M0-M3 (ω0ω2) with the proportion of each site class in parentheses. For M7 and M8, the shape parameters, p and q, which describe the beta distribution are listed instead. In addition, the ω value for the positively selected site class (ωp, with the proportion of sites in parentheses) is shown for M8.

2Significant p-values (α ≤0.05) are bolded. Degrees of freedom are given in square brackets after the p-values.

3#Model fits were assessed by Akaike information criterion differences to the best fitting model (asterisk).

Abbreviations—lnL, ln Likelihood; p, p-value; N/A, not applicable.