Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;7:e35957. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35957

Table 8. Analyses of selection on Teleost rhodopsin (rh1) using PAML random sites models.

Model lnL Parameters1 Null P [df] Δ AIC§
ω0/p ω1/q ω2/ωp
M0 −32949.46 0.10 - - N/A - 4489.79
M1a −31605.10 0.05 (86%) 1.00 (14%) - M0 0.000 [1] 1803.10
M2a −31605.10 0.05 (86%) 1.00 (10%) 1.00 (4%) M1a 1 [2] 1807.10
M3 −30887.40 0.01 (58%) 0.13 (29%) 0.57 (13%) M0 0.000 [4] 373.67
M8a −30790.44 0.28 3.05 1.00 N/A - 173.76
M7 −30767.11 0.19 0.68 - N/A - 127.10
M8 −30702.57 0.25 1.62 1.92 M7 0.000 [2] 0*
M8a 0.000 [1]

values of each site class are shown are shown for model M0-M3 (ω0ω2) with the proportion of each site class in parentheses. For M7 and M8, the shape parameters, p and q, which describe the beta distribution are listed instead. In addition, the ω value for the positively selected site class (ωp, with the proportion of sites in parentheses) is shown for M8.

2Significant p-values (α ≤0.05) are bolded. Degrees of freedom are given in square brackets after the p-values.

3#§Model fits were assessed by Akaike information criterion differences to the best fitting model (asterisk).

Abbreviations—lnL, ln Likelihood; p, p-value; N/A, not applicable.