Table 3.
Comparison of the SOC clinic (model 1) to the Three YFHS Clinics (models 2–4)
| Proportion receiving service |
Unadjusted RD (95% CI) |
Adjusted aRD (95% CI) |
Mean times service received |
Unadjusted IRR (95% CI) |
Adjusted aIRR (95% CI) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV test† | ||||||||||
| Model 1 | 72% | 0. | 0. | 1.07 | 1. | 1. | ||||
| Model 2–4 | 97% | 25% | (20%, 31%) | 23% | (16%, 29%) | 2.68 | 2.50 | (2.1, 3.0) | 2.37 | (1.9, 2.9) |
| Condoms‡ | ||||||||||
| Model 1 | 26% | 0. | 0. | 0.28 | 1. | 1. | ||||
| Model 2–4 | 83% | 57% | (50%, 63%) | 57% | (51%, 63%) | 2.33 | 8.19 | (6.2, 10.8) | 7.90 | (6.0, 10.5) |
| Hormonal contraception§ | ||||||||||
| Model 1 | 10% | 0. | 0. | 0.15 | 1. | 1. | ||||
| Model 2–4 | 54% | 43% | (38%, 48%) | 39% | (34%, 45%) | 1.00 | 6.78 | (4.7, 9.7) | 6.03 | (4.2, 8.7) |
| Dual methodsठ| ||||||||||
| Model 1 | 0% | 0. | 0. | 0.01 | 1. | 1. | ||||
| Models 2–4 | 34% | 34% | (30%, 37%) | 33% | (29%, 36%) | 0.50 | 62.00 | (15.3, 250.7) | 53.39 | (13.2, 216.0) |
| Any STI services¶ | ||||||||||
| Model 1 | 0% | 0. | 0. | 0.00 | 1. | 1. | ||||
| Models 2–4 | 18% | 17% | (14%, 20%) | 16% | (13%, 19%) | 0.26 | 64.00 | (8.9, 459.0) | 51.01 | (7.1, 368.1) |
*
All models control for age, number of children, and marital status measured at baseline.
Some models also controls for baseline HIV testing†, condom use‡ hormonal contraceptive use,§ or history of self-reported STI symptoms.¶
RD=Risk Difference, aRD=adjusted risk difference, CI=Confidence interval, IRR=incidence rate ratio, aIRR=adjusted incidence rate ratio