Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Dec 1;79(4):458–466. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001830

Table 4.

Two-Way Comparisons of the Four Models of Care

Proportion ever
receiving service
Differences in Proportions Mean times
service
received
Differences in Means


1 v. 2 2. v. 3 3 v. 4 1 v. 2 2. v. 3 3 v. 4
HIV tests
  Model 1 72% 1.07
  Model 2 96% < 0.001 2.28 <0.001
  Model 3 100% 0.001 2.86 <0.001
  Model 4 96% 0.001 2.90 0.7
Condoms
  Model 1 26% 0.28
  Model 2 78% < 0.001 1.62 <0.001
  Model 3 80% 0.7 1.74 0.3
  Model 4 89% 0.004 3.63 <0.001
Hormonal contraception
  Model 1 10% 0.15
  Model 2 52% < 0.001 0.92 <0.001
  Model 3 35% < 0.001 <0.001
  Model 4 74% < 0.001 1.54 <0.001
Dual methods
  Model 1 0% 0.01
  Model 2 27% <0.001 0.35 <0.001
  Model 3 22% 0.3 0.27 0.1
  Model 4 54% <0.001 0.87 <0.001
Any STI services from assigned clinic
  Model 1 0% 0.00
  Model 2 11% 0.001 0.16 0.001
  Model 3 17% 0.04 0.20 0.4
  Model 4 25% 0.02 0.40 0.001