Table 3:
Year | Team | Study type | Accuracy | DOF | Actuation type | Control type | SNR | Design | Institute |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | Yang et al. [62] | Animal study | The target was reached in total of 50 minutes | 6 DOF | 5 pneumatic cylinders 1 Piezomotor |
Interactive MRI master–slave |
Less than 8% drop | 5 DOF robot 1 DOF needle drive |
University of Maryland |
2016 | Chan et al. [63] | In air | 0.34 mm | 6 DOF | Piezoelectric motors |
- | 13% drop in 1.5 Tesla 2.5% drop in 3.0 Tesla |
3 subsystems: the manipulator, a toolset, and a patient support | McMaster University |
2017 | Park et al. [59] | Phantom | 2.3 mm | 4 DOF | Piezoelectric motors |
Automated needle drive | acceptable for manual and automatic image segmentation | Bendable needle curved trajectory |
National Cancer Center Republic of Korea |
2017 | Navarro-Alarcon et al. [65] | Phantom | ±0.4 mm x and y And ±1.5 mm insertion |
3 DOF | Piezo motors and pneumatic actuators | Automated needle drive | No significant degradation of the MR images | Cartesian mechanism | The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
2017 | Groenhuis et al. [66] | In air | Mean 0.7 mm, with a reproducibility of 0.1 mm | 4 DOF | Linear and curved pneumatic stepper motors | Manual mode and automatic mode | - | Serial kinematic chain | University of Twente |
2017 | Zhang et al. [67] | Phantom | - | 7 DOF | Flexible shafts and remote DC motors | - | - | Positioning module (4 DOF) Puncturing module Biopsy module Storage module |
School of Harbin University of Science and Technology |