. 2018 Oct 11;6:2700710. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2868671

TABLE 2. Comparison Between Manual (mus), Manual Biopac^® (mb) and Semi-Automated (saus) Mean Measurements of the MRR Based on the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for the nres and res Groups.

	NRES_MRR_MUS	RES_MRR_MUS	NRES_MRR_MB	RES_MRR_MB
NRES_MRR_SAUS	S (p = 0.0001) (p = 0.01)		NS (p = 0.62) (p = 0.001)
RES_MRR_SAUS		S (p = 0.02) (p = 0.01)		NS (p = 0.58) (p = 0.02)
NRES_MRR_MB	S(p = 0.001) (p = 0.001)
RES_MRR_MB		NS(p = 0.3) (p = 0.05)

MUS, MB, SAUS: Manual, manual Biopac^® and automated, ultrasound measurements; SD: Significantly different at p<0.05, NS: non-statistical significant different at Inline graphic ; : Spearman correlation coefficient; NS, S: Non-significantly statistically different at , significantly statistically different at p<0.05.

TABLE 2. Comparison Between Manual (mus), Manual Biopac® (mb) and Semi-Automated (saus) Mean Measurements of the MRR Based on the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for the nres and res Groups.

TABLE 2. Comparison Between Manual (mus), Manual Biopac^® (mb) and Semi-Automated (saus) Mean Measurements of the MRR Based on the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for the nres and res Groups.