Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 28;52(5):357–362. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.06.004

Table 4.

Group comparisons of algometer and dynamometer values.

US (n = 24) ESWT (n = 20) p*
Dynamometer (kg) BT#," Median (min–max) 18.45 (9.6–37) #," 18.95 (9.3–36.6)" 0.552
Dynamometer (kg) ATβ Median (min–max) 21 (11–38.4)β 21.65 (11.03–34.6)
Dynamometer (kg) 1 month
Median (min–max)
22.5 (12.3–37.6)
22 (11.3–36)

p** 0.001 0.015

Algometer (kg/cm2) BT#," Mean ± sd 7.69 ± 2.11#," 7.75 ± 2.36#," 0.029
Algometer (kg/cm2) ATβ Mean ± sd 11.40 ± 2.65β 12.34 ± 1.99β
Algometer (kg/cm2) 1 month
Mean ± sd
14.10 ± 3.19
16.56 ± 2.79

p** <0.0001 <0.0001

p*: between groups.

p**: within groups.

BT: Before treatment; AT: After treatment; US: Therapeutic ultrasound; ESWT: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy.

Statistically significant differences according to post hoc analysis: #: before treatment-after treatment, ": before treatment-1 month follow up, β: after treatment-1 month follow up.