Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 22;9:1326. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01326

Table 1.

Average reduction of maize grain yield (%), kernel number per ear (%), and kernel weight (%) that resulted from water deficits during 2014–2016.

Treatment Grain yield reduction (%) Kernel number reduction per ear (%) 1000-kernel weight reduction (%)
CK
V6−8 8.9∗∗∗ 5.1 ns 2.9 ns
V9−12 23.8∗∗∗ 9.4∗∗ 12.2∗∗∗
V13−T 26.7∗∗∗ 14.0∗∗∗ 11.1∗∗∗
R1−2 33.7∗∗∗ 19.1∗∗∗ 3.8∗∗
ANOVA
Year ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗
Water deficit ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗
Year × Water deficit ns ns ns

CK, well-irrigated treatment; V6−8, water deficit during the 6–8-leaf stage; V9−12, water deficit during the 9–12-leaf stage; V13−T, water deficit from the 13-leaf stage to tasseling stage, R1−2, water deficit from the silking stage to blister stage. ∗∗ and ∗∗∗ indicate significance at P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively; ns indicates no statistically significant relationship.