Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;6(10):2325967118804478. doi: 10.1177/2325967118804478

TABLE 3.

Quality Assessment Tool: Modified Downs and Blacka

Study Aim Patient Sample Bias Cmpr Outcm Valid Blind Find Rand Stat Cnfd Adj Smpl Calc Power Total Quality
Li25 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 12 High
Boutefnouchet4 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 10 Mod
Garofalo13 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 10 Mod
Lee24 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 10 Mod
MacGillivray29 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 Mod
Mariani30 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 Mod
Mygind-Klavsen35 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 Mod
Noh36 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 10 Mod
Song46 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 Mod
Yang52 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 11 Mod
Yoon53 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 11 Mod
Zayni54 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 10 Mod
Chan6 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 9 Low
Osti37 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Low

aScoring system: Adj, adequate adjustment for confounding; Aim, aim of study; Bias, selection bias present; Blind, attempt to blind measurers; Cmpr, comparison group identified; Cnfd, clearly described distributions of principle confounders (score, 0-2); Find, main findings of study; Outcm, clearly described outcomes; Patient, patient characteristics; Power, sufficient power in study; Rand, estimates of random variability; Sample, sample is representative; Smpl calc, reported sample size calculation; Stat, statistical tests used; Valid, measures are valid and reliable.

bQuality: ≥12, high; 10 or 11, moderate (mod); ≤9, low.