Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 25;56(11):e00930-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00930-18

TABLE 1.

Performance of STA platforms for detection of FluA, FluB, and RSVa

Virus and parameter Value(s) for the following platform:
Fusion Aries Liat Xpert Simplexa BioFire RP
FluA
    No. of samples with the following result:
        TP 75 74 75 74 74 75
        TN 150 150 150 149 150 150
        FP 0 0 0 1 0 0
        FN 0 1 0 1 1 0
    % sensitivity (95% CI) 100 (93.9–100) 98.6 (91.7–99.9) 100.0 (93.9–100) 98.6 (91.7–99.9) 98.63 (91.7–99.9) 100 (93.9–100)
    % specificity (95% CI) 100 (96.8–100) 100 (96.8–100) 100 (96.8–100) 99.3 (95.7 −99.9) 100 (96.8–100) 100 (96.8–100)
    Subtype of sample with FN result None pH1N1 None H3N2 H3N2 None
FluB
    No. of samples with the following result:
        TP 48 45 47 47 41 46
        TN 177 176 174 176 176 173
        FP 0 1 3 1 1 4
        FN 0 3 1 1 7 2
    % sensitivity (95% CI) 100 (90.7–100) 93.7 (81.8–98.3) 97.9 (87.5–99.8) 97.9 (87.5–99.8) 85.4 (71.6–93.5) 95.8 (84.6–99.2)
    % specificity (95% CI) 100 (97.3–100) 99.4 (96.4–99.9) 98.3 (94.7–99.6) 99.4 (96.3–99.9) 99.4 (96.4–99.9) 97.7 (93.9–99.2)
    Subtype of sample with FN result (no. of strains) None Yamagata (3) Yamagata Yamagata Yamagata (5), Victoria (2) Yamagata (2)
RSV
    No. of samples with the following result:
        TP 52 51 53 53 47 51
        TN 171 171 170 170 170 171
        FP 0 0 1 1 1 0
        FN 2 3 1 1 7 3
    % sensitivity (95% CI) 96.3 (86.2–99.3) 94.4 (83.6–98.5) 98.1 (88.8–99.9) 98.1 (88.8–99.9) 87 (74.5–94.2) 94.4 (83.6–98.5)
    % specificity (95% CI) 100 (97.2–100) 100 (97.2–100) 99.4 (96.3–99.9) 99.4 (96.3–99.9) 99.4 (96.3–99.9) 100 (97.2–100)
    Subtype of sample with FN result Not performed Not performed Not performed Not performed Not performed Not performed
a

TP, true positive; TN, true negative; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; CI, confidence interval.